ETFIQ
RankingsCompareHoldingsFlowsResearch
Ask ETFIQETF ModelsMy portfolioWeekly note
A
vs
B
Share on XDownload as PDFOpen liveAsk about these two funds

CSIO vs IGF: which is really different?

CSIO holds 54.2% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and IGF 31.9%. Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF and iShares Global Infrastructure ETF.

IGF costs 0.28 points a year less; IGF is far larger, $10.3bn against $44m.

CSIOIGF
Expense ratio0.65%0.37%
Net assets, CSIO as of Jun 30, 2026 and IGF as of Oct 8, 2026$44m$10.3bn
Total return, 1 yearnot published+5.3%
What it tracksInfrastructureInfrastructure
Holdings in commonnot published
S&P 500, total return, since Dec 10, 2025+14.4%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, since Dec 10, 2025behind by 2.8 pts
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 11.9 pts
Below its all-time high5.3%, high on Jul 24, 20268.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026
54.2%
CSIO in the S&P 500
31.9%
IGF in the S&P 500
+11.6%
CSIO total return, since launch
+5.3%
IGF total return, 1 year
CSIO · 6 months to Oct 9, 202646% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of CSIO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.54%46%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 52% of the fund · 29 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 7% in46% of its weight is outside the S&P 50054% of CSIO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.54%46%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 7% in

54% of CSIO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 46% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

IGF · 1 year to Oct 9, 202668% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
68% of its weight is outside the S&P 50032% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.32%68%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 38% of the fund · 78 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 7% in68% of its weight is outside the S&P 50032% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.32%68%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · Nasdaq-100: 7% in

32% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · CSIO scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowCSIOIGFCSIOIGFCSIOIGF
3 months−4.3%−6.2%−7.6 pts−9.6 pts−7.9 pts−9.9 pts
6 months−2.6%−7.3%−17.7 pts−22.4 pts−25.8 pts−30.5 pts
1 yearnot published+5.3%not published−11.9 ptsnot published−18.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+62.1%not published−23.6 ptsnot published−45.1 pts
Since launch
CSIO Dec 2025 · IGF Dec 2007
+11.6%+129.4%−2.8 pts−508.6 pts−8.7 pts−1,460.7 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CSIO
Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Opportunities Active ETF · Holds 29 stocks in infrastructure, 54% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IGF
iShares Global Infrastructure ETF · Holds 78 stocks in infrastructure, 32% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Cohen & Steers iShares
Theme Infrastructure Infrastructure
In the S&P 500 54.2% 31.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.0% 98.3%
In the Nasdaq-100 6.8% 7.2%
Holdings 29 78
Top ten, share of the fund 51.9% 38.0%
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.37%
Fee for the differing part 0.66% 0.38%
Total return, 1 year +11.6% (since it first traded on Dec 10, 2025) +5.3%
vs the S&P 500 −2.8 pts −11.9 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −8.7 pts −18.2 pts
Below its high −5.3% −8.3%
Net assets, CSIO as of Jun 30, 2026 and IGF as of Oct 8, 2026 $44m $10.3bn

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CSIO in plain words

By weight, 54% of CSIO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 29 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Dec 10, 2025 the fund returned +11.6% with distributions reinvested against +14.4% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 2.8 pts. It sits 5.3% below its all-time high of Jul 24, 2026.

IGF in plain words

By weight, 32% of IGF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 78 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CSIO or IGF?
CSIO has 54% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGF has 32%, so CSIO differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CSIO or IGF?
CSIO charges 0.65% a year and IGF charges 0.37%, so IGF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
CSIO vs IFRACSIO vs PAVECSIO vs GIICSIO vs TOLZIGF vs RBLDIGF vs IPAVIGF vs NFRAIGF vs UPGR
CSIO on its own →IGF on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
CSIO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CSIO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Cohen & Steers website ↗IGF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗iShares page for IGF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CSIO against IGF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/csio-vs-igf

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.