COPP vs ICOP: which is really different?

COPP and ICOP hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and COPP returned +51.2% over the year. Sprott Copper Miners ETF and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF.

25.1%
COPP in the S&P 500
13.2%
ICOP in the S&P 500
+51.2%
COPP total return, 1 year
+44.3%
ICOP total return, 1 year
COPP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202675% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
75% of its weight is outside the S&P 50025% of COPP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index25%75%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 76% of the fund · 80 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in75% of its weight is outside the S&P 50025% of COPP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index25%75%inoutside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 76% of the fund

25% of COPP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 75% is outside the index

ICOP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202687% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 87 holdings filed Sep 29, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund

13% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · COPP scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COPP and ICOP hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 29, 2026.

half

45% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding COPP ICOP
Freeport-mcmoran Inc 25.12% 8.29%
Southern Copper Corp 4.83% 4.89%
Antofagasta Plc 9.35% 4.43%
Kghm Polska Miedz Sa 4.89% 3.13%
Capstone Copper Corp 3.33% 1.84%
Mmg Ltd 1.92% 1.31%
Atalaya Mining Copper Sa 0.68% 0.53%
Faraday Copper Corp 0.54% 0.26%
Amerigo Resources Ltd 0.32% 0.25%
Firefly Metals Ltd 0.48% 0.24%
Osisko Metals Inc 0.42% 0.24%
Aeris Resources Ltd 0.13% 0.12%
Only in COPP
Teck Resources Ltd 10.04%
Sprott Physical Copper Trust 5.22%
First Quantum Minerals Ltd 4.70%
Lundin Mining Corp 4.32%
Hudbay Minerals Inc 4.29%
Ivanhoe Mines Ltd 2.71%
Sandfire Resources Ltd 2.58%
Amman Mineral Internasional Pt 1.76%
Only in ICOP
ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 8.16%
GRUPO MEXICO B 8.11%
BHP GROUP LTD 7.76%
TECK RESOURCES SUBORDINATE VOTING 5.68%
NEWMONT 4.93%
FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS 4.80%
LUNDIN MINING 4.42%
HUDBAY MINERALS 3.20%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

45% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowCOPPICOPCOPPICOPCOPPICOP
3 months+10.9%+9.6%+8.4 pts+7.1 pts+8.8 pts+7.5 pts
6 months+14.0%+8.9%−3.0 pts−8.0 pts−12.9 pts−17.9 pts
1 year+51.2%+44.3%+35.5 pts+28.5 pts+27.4 pts+20.5 pts
3 yearsnot published+137.4%not published+52.4 ptsnot published+27.4 pts
Since launch
COPP Mar 2024 · ICOP Jun 2023
+117.4%+134.9%+62.9 pts+51.7 pts+46.4 pts+27.1 pts

COPP and ICOP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

COPP
Sprott Copper Miners ETF · Holds 80 stocks in copper, 25% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · Holds 87 stocks in copper, 13% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Sprott iShares
Theme Copper Copper
In the S&P 500 25.1% 13.2%
Active share vs the S&P 500 99.9% 99.7%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 80 87
Top ten, share of the fund 76.1% 61.5%
Expense ratio 0.66% 0.47%
Fee for the differing part 0.66% 0.47%
Total return, 1 year +51.2% +44.3%
vs the S&P 500 +35.5 pts +28.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 +27.4 pts +20.5 pts
Below its high −11.1% −12.6%
Net assets $279m $467m

COPP and ICOP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COPP in plain words

By weight, 25% of COPP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 80 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +51.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 35.5 pts. It sits 11.1% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.

ICOP in plain words

By weight, 13% of ICOP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 87 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +44.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.5 pts. It sits 12.6% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do COPP and ICOP hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 45% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPP or ICOP?
COPP has 25% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ICOP has 13%, so COPP differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, COPP or ICOP?
COPP charges 0.66% a year and ICOP charges 0.47%, so ICOP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, COPP against ICOP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copp-vs-icop

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.