COPJ vs ICOP: which is really different?

COPJ and ICOP hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and COPJ returned +55.1% over the year. Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF and iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF.

0.0%
COPJ in the S&P 500
13.2%
ICOP in the S&P 500
+55.1%
COPJ total return, 1 year
+44.3%
ICOP total return, 1 year
COPJ · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of COPJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 44% of the fund · 69 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of COPJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 44% of the fund

0% of COPJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ICOP · 1 year to Sep 30, 202687% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 87 holdings filed Sep 29, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in87% of its weight is outside the S&P 50013% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index13%87%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund

13% of ICOP's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 87% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · COPJ scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, COPJ and ICOP hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 29, 2026.

half

5% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding COPJ ICOP
Atalaya Mining Copper Sa 4.92% 0.53%
Faraday Copper Corp 5.08% 0.26%
Amerigo Resources Ltd 3.41% 0.25%
Firefly Metals Ltd 4.45% 0.24%
Osisko Metals Inc 4.50% 0.24%
Aeris Resources Ltd 1.44% 0.12%
Aic Mines Ltd 1.88% 0.10%
Central Asia Metals Plc 1.63% 0.10%
Cobre Ltd 0.93% 0.07%
Carnaby Resources Ltd 0.57% 0.04%
Only in COPJ
Trekor Metals Ltd 4.97%
Ero Copper Corp 4.77%
Solaris Resources Inc 4.41%
Ivanhoe Electric Inc / Us 3.83%
Sociedad Punta Del Cobre Sa 3.63%
Trilogy Metals Inc 2.82%
Atex Resources Inc 2.77%
Blue Moon Metals Inc 2.74%
Only in ICOP
FREEPORT MCMORAN INC 8.29%
ANGLO AMERICAN PLC 8.16%
GRUPO MEXICO B 8.11%
BHP GROUP LTD 7.76%
TECK RESOURCES SUBORDINATE VOTING 5.68%
NEWMONT 4.93%
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP 4.89%
FIRST QUANTUM MINERALS 4.80%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

5% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowCOPJICOPCOPJICOPCOPJICOP
3 months+12.4%+9.6%+9.9 pts+7.1 pts+10.3 pts+7.5 pts
6 months+10.2%+8.9%−6.8 pts−8.0 pts−16.7 pts−17.9 pts
1 year+55.1%+44.3%+39.4 pts+28.5 pts+31.3 pts+20.5 pts
3 years+216.7%+137.4%+131.7 pts+52.4 pts+106.7 pts+27.4 pts
Since launch
COPJ Feb 2023 · ICOP Jun 2023
+182.0%+134.9%+90.2 pts+51.7 pts+39.6 pts+27.1 pts

COPJ and ICOP over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF · Holds 69 stocks in copper, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
ICOP
iShares Copper and Metals Mining ETF · Holds 87 stocks in copper, 13% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Sprott iShares
Theme Copper Copper
In the S&P 500 0.0% 13.2%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 99.7%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 69 87
Top ten, share of the fund 44.0% 61.5%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.47%
Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.47%
Total return, 1 year +55.1% +44.3%
vs the S&P 500 +39.4 pts +28.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 +31.3 pts +20.5 pts
Below its high −14.8% −12.6%
Net assets $163m $467m

COPJ and ICOP on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

COPJ in plain words

By weight, 0% of COPJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 44% of the fund across 69 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +55.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 39.4 pts. It sits 14.8% below its all-time high of Jan 29, 2026.

ICOP in plain words

By weight, 13% of ICOP's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 87 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +44.3% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 28.5 pts. It sits 12.6% below its all-time high of Aug 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do COPJ and ICOP hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, COPJ or ICOP?
COPJ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ICOP has 13%, so COPJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, COPJ or ICOP?
COPJ charges 0.75% a year and ICOP charges 0.47%, so ICOP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, COPJ against ICOP, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/copj-vs-icop

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.