CLOD vs IGV: which is really different?

CLOD and IGV hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and CLOD returned +0.1% over the year. Themes Cloud Computing ETF and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF.

70.1%
CLOD in the S&P 500
80.7%
IGV in the S&P 500
+0.1%
CLOD total return, 1 year
−7.4%
IGV total return, 1 year
CLOD · 1 year to Sep 30, 202630% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
30% of its weight is outside the S&P 50070% of CLOD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 30% is outside the index70%30%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 87% · top ten 47% of the fund · 51 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 61% in30% of its weight is outside the S&P 50070% of CLOD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 30% is outside the index70%30%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 87% · top ten 47% of the fund

70% of CLOD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 30% is outside the index

IGV · 1 year to Sep 30, 202619% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index81%19%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 62% of the fund · 111 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 66% in19% of its weight is outside the S&P 50081% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index81%19%in the S&P 50019% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 92% · top ten 62% of the fund

81% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · IGV scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CLOD and IGV hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

59% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CLOD IGV
Palo Alto Networks Inc 7.54% 9.66%
Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 7.14% 8.87%
ServiceNow Inc 4.10% 4.41%
Oracle Corp 3.93% 6.92%
Fortinet Inc 3.82% 3.82%
Microsoft Corp 3.73% 8.50%
Salesforce Inc 3.39% 4.06%
Adobe Inc 3.26% 3.30%
Datadog Inc 3.31% 3.18%
Cadence Design Systems Inc 4.13% 3.15%
Synopsys Inc 3.37% 2.88%
AppLovin Corp 5.03% 2.73%
Only in CLOD
Alphabet Inc 4.15%
Amazon.com Inc 3.78%
SAP SE 3.48%
Snowflake Inc 3.39%
MercadoLibre Inc 3.22%
Cloudflare Inc 3.09%
Nebius Group NV 2.26%
Prosus NV 2.12%
Only in IGV
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 8.99%
TAKE TWO INTERACTIVE SOFTWARE 1.26%
ROPER TECHNOLOGIES 1.20%
ATLASSIAN CORP CLASS A 0.99%
RUBRIK CLASS A 0.64%
CIRCLE INTERNET GROUP INC CLASS A 0.57%
BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES 0.55%
PTC 0.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

59% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowCLODIGVCLODIGVCLODIGV
3 months+11.1%+14.1%+8.6 pts+11.6 pts+9.0 pts+12.0 pts
6 months+36.6%+33.5%+19.7 pts+16.5 pts+9.8 pts+6.6 pts
1 year+0.1%−7.4%−15.7 pts−23.1 pts−23.7 pts−31.2 pts
3 yearsnot published+56.0%not published−28.9 ptsnot published−53.9 pts
Since launch
CLOD Dec 2023 · IGV Jan 2010
+41.6%+1052.2%−26.2 pts+247.5 pts−44.0 pts−685.4 pts

CLOD and IGV over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CLOD
Themes Cloud Computing ETF · Holds 51 stocks in cloud and software, 70% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
IGV
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Holds 111 stocks in cloud and software, 81% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Themes iShares
Theme Cloud and software Cloud and software
In the S&P 500 70.1% 80.7%
Active share vs the S&P 500 86.6% 92.4%
In the Nasdaq-100 60.8% 65.7%
Holdings 51 111
Top ten, share of the fund 47.4% 61.7%
Expense ratio 0.35% 0.38%
Fee for the differing part 0.40% 0.41%
Total return, 1 year +0.1% −7.4%
vs the S&P 500 −15.7 pts −23.1 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −23.7 pts −31.2 pts
Below its high −2.3% −9.6%
Net assets $2m $13.9bn

CLOD and IGV on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CLOD in plain words

By weight, 70% of CLOD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 87%. The top ten holdings are 47% of the fund across 51 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 15.7 pts.

IGV in plain words

By weight, 81% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 111 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −7.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 23.1 pts. It sits 9.6% below its all-time high of Sep 22, 2025.

Questions people ask

Do CLOD and IGV hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 59% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is close to holding one of them twice. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CLOD or IGV?
CLOD has 70% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 81%, so IGV differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CLOD or IGV?
CLOD charges 0.35% a year and IGV charges 0.38%, so CLOD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, CLOD against IGV, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/clod-vs-igv

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.