CIBR vs PSWD: which is really different?

CIBR and PSWD hold 44% of their weight in the same names, and CIBR returned +36.4% over the year. First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF and Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF.

62.9%
CIBR in the S&P 500
28.4%
PSWD in the S&P 500
+36.4%
CIBR total return, 1 year
+30.2%
PSWD total return, 1 year
CIBR · 1 year to Sep 30, 202637% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
37% of its weight is outside the S&P 50063% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 37% is outside the index63%37%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 91% · top ten 59% of the fund · 47 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 50% in37% of its weight is outside the S&P 50063% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 37% is outside the index63%37%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 91% · top ten 59% of the fund

63% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 37% is outside the index

PSWD · 1 year to Sep 30, 202672% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
72% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of PSWD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index28%72%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 52% of the fund · 52 holdings filed May 29, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 23% in72% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of PSWD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index28%72%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 52% of the fund

28% of PSWD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · PSWD scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and PSWD hold 44% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 29, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

half

44% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CIBR PSWD
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.89% 6.24%
Fortinet, Inc. 8.11% 5.77%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 8.07% 5.69%
Okta, Inc. 4.42% 6.13%
F5, Inc. 3.61% 4.39%
Zscaler, Inc. 3.59% 3.85%
Rubrik, Inc. (Class A) 2.68% 5.74%
Akamai Technologies, Inc. 2.00% 4.60%
Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. 1.74% 3.21%
Datadog, Inc. (Class A) 2.24% 1.69%
SentinelOne, Inc. (Class A) 1.26% 4.37%
Dynatrace, Inc. 2.05% 0.94%
Only in CIBR
Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.56%
Broadcom Inc. 7.36%
Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 4.42%
NetApp, Inc. 2.20%
Arista Networks, Inc. 2.02%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 1.97%
Microsoft Corporation 1.96%
JFrog Ltd. 1.88%
Only in PSWD
NEXTDC LTD 4.81%
TREND MICRO INC 3.78%
GDS HOLDINGS LTD 2.75%
ZETRIX AI BHD 1.28%
VNET GROUP INC 1.28%
NETCOMPANY GROUP A/S 1.15%
TEAMVIEWER SE 1.04%
CLEAR SECURE INC 0.84%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

44% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowCIBRPSWDCIBRPSWDCIBRPSWD
3 months+13.2%+13.4%+10.6 pts+10.9 pts+11.0 pts+11.3 pts
6 months+63.4%+57.8%+46.4 pts+40.8 pts+36.5 pts+30.9 pts
1 year+36.4%+30.2%+20.7 pts+14.5 pts+12.6 pts+6.4 pts
3 years+129.8%+93.8%+44.9 pts+8.9 pts+19.9 pts−16.1 pts
Since launch
CIBR Jul 2015 · PSWD Jul 2023
+447.2%+92.0%+106.0 pts+15.4 pts−197.2 pts−6.7 pts

CIBR and PSWD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CIBR
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF · Holds 47 stocks in cybersecurity, 63% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF · Holds 52 stocks in cybersecurity, 28% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer First Trust Xtrackers
Theme Cybersecurity Cybersecurity
In the S&P 500 62.9% 28.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500 90.6% 98.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 49.7% 23.2%
Holdings 47 52
Top ten, share of the fund 58.7% 52.0%
Expense ratio 0.58% 0.20%
Fee for the differing part 0.64% 0.20%
Total return, 1 year +36.4% +30.2%
vs the S&P 500 +20.7 pts +14.5 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 +12.6 pts +6.4 pts
Below its high −0.9% −2.3%
Net assets $17.3bn $6m

CIBR and PSWD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CIBR in plain words

By weight, 63% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 47 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +36.4% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 20.7 pts.

PSWD in plain words

By weight, 28% of PSWD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for May 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +30.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 14.5 pts.

Questions people ask

Do CIBR and PSWD hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 44% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is a meaningful overlap. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or PSWD?
CIBR has 63% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PSWD has 28%, so PSWD differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CIBR or PSWD?
CIBR charges 0.58% a year and PSWD charges 0.20%, so PSWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, CIBR against PSWD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-pswd

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.