PSWD vs SPAM: which is really different?

PSWD and SPAM hold 76% of their weight in the same names, and SPAM returned +35.1% over the year. Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF and Themes Cybersecurity ETF.

28.4%
PSWD in the S&P 500
26.4%
SPAM in the S&P 500
+30.2%
PSWD total return, 1 year
+35.1%
SPAM total return, 1 year
PSWD · 1 year to Sep 30, 202672% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
72% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of PSWD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index28%72%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 52% of the fund · 52 holdings filed May 29, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 23% in72% of its weight is outside the S&P 50028% of PSWD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index28%72%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 52% of the fund

28% of PSWD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index

SPAM · 1 year to Sep 30, 202674% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
74% of its weight is outside the S&P 50026% of SPAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index26%74%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 54% of the fund · 35 holdings filed Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 22% in74% of its weight is outside the S&P 50026% of SPAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index26%74%inoutside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 54% of the fund

26% of SPAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 74% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · SPAM scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, PSWD and SPAM hold 76% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 29, 2026.

half

76% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding PSWD SPAM
OKTA INC 6.13% 6.36%
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS INC 6.24% 6.06%
FORTINET INC 5.77% 6.02%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS INC 5.69% 6.45%
RUBRIK INC 5.74% 5.50%
F5 INC 4.39% 4.46%
SENTINELONE INC 4.37% 3.99%
ZSCALER INC 3.85% 3.65%
QUALYS INC 4.29% 3.64%
NEXTDC LTD 4.81% 3.60%
VARONIS SYSTEMS INC 4.25% 3.53%
TREND MICRO INC 3.78% 3.43%
Only in PSWD
GDS HOLDINGS LTD 2.75%
DATADOG INC 1.69%
ZETRIX AI BHD 1.28%
VNET GROUP INC 1.28%
TEAMVIEWER SE 1.04%
NETSCOUT SYSTEMS INC 0.95%
DYNATRACE INC 0.94%
NEC CORP 0.75%
Only in SPAM
Nebius Group NV 6.40%
CACI International Inc 2.58%
Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Co 2.41%
Netskope Inc 1.62%
SailPoint Inc 0.60%
BTQ Technologies Corp 0.38%
Gorilla Technology Group Inc 0.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

76% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowPSWDSPAMPSWDSPAMPSWDSPAM
3 months+13.4%+10.9%+10.9 pts+8.4 pts+11.3 pts+8.8 pts
6 months+57.8%+61.0%+40.8 pts+44.0 pts+30.9 pts+34.1 pts
1 year+30.2%+35.1%+14.5 pts+19.4 pts+6.4 pts+11.3 pts
3 years+93.8%not published+8.9 ptsnot published−16.1 ptsnot published
Since launch
PSWD Jul 2023 · SPAM Dec 2023
+92.0%+88.0%+15.4 pts+16.1 pts−6.7 pts−3.9 pts

PSWD and SPAM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF · Holds 52 stocks in cybersecurity, 28% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
SPAM
Themes Cybersecurity ETF · Holds 35 stocks in cybersecurity, 26% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Xtrackers Themes
Theme Cybersecurity Cybersecurity
In the S&P 500 28.4% 26.4%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.9% 99.1%
In the Nasdaq-100 23.2% 22.2%
Holdings 52 35
Top ten, share of the fund 52.0% 54.4%
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.35%
Fee for the differing part 0.20% 0.35%
Total return, 1 year +30.2% +35.1%
vs the S&P 500 +14.5 pts +19.4 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 +6.4 pts +11.3 pts
Below its high −2.3% −1.9%
Net assets $6m $7m

PSWD and SPAM on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

PSWD in plain words

By weight, 28% of PSWD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 52% of the fund across 52 positions, as filed for May 29, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +30.2% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 14.5 pts.

SPAM in plain words

By weight, 26% of SPAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 54% of the fund across 35 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +35.1% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 19.4 pts.

Questions people ask

Do PSWD and SPAM hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 76% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is close to holding one of them twice. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, PSWD or SPAM?
PSWD has 28% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SPAM has 26%, so SPAM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, PSWD or SPAM?
PSWD charges 0.20% a year and SPAM charges 0.35%, so PSWD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, PSWD against SPAM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/pswd-vs-spam

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.