Do CIBR and KWEB hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or KWEB?

CIBR has 61% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CIBR or KWEB?

CIBR charges 0.58% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CIBR vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CIBR returned +39.0% to KWEB's −40.6%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CIBR and KWEB

Net assets: $19.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF, and $4.3bn on Oct 28, 2026 for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.

CIBR on its own →KWEB on its own →

At a glance

60.8%

CIBR in the S&P 500

0.0%

KWEB in the S&P 500

+39.0%

CIBR total return, 1 year

−40.6%

KWEB total return, 1 year

CIBR · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 39% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

61% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

KWEB · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CIBR costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 79.6 points; CIBR is 4.4 times larger.

CIBR vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CIBR	KWEB
Return
Measure	CIBR	KWEB
Total return, 1 year	+39.0%	−40.6%
Drawdown
Measure	CIBR	KWEB
Below its all-time high		73.4%, high on Feb 17, 2021
Benchmark
Measure	CIBR	KWEB
What it tracks	Cybersecurity	Internet and e-commerce
Cost and size
Measure	CIBR	KWEB
Expense ratio	0.58%	0.69%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$19.0bn	$4.3bn
Holdings
Measure	CIBR	KWEB
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 17, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 588 weekly returns

CIBR KWEB

Return

Total return edge CIBR +450.4% −23.2%

Annualized edge CIBR +16.3% −2.3%

Price return edge CIBR +417.9% −39.5%

Risk

Volatility edge CIBR 23.7% 36.4%

Max drawdown edge CIBR −33.9% −79.9%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge CIBR 0.66 0.05

Sortino edge CIBR 0.99 0.08

Calmar edge CIBR 0.48 −0.03

Reading

CIBR returned more: +450.4% to −23.2%. CIBR swung less: 23.7% to 36.4%. CIBR fell less at its worst: −33.9% to −79.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: CIBR vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CIBR	KWEB	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+450.4%	−23.2%	CIBR	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+16.3%	−2.3%	CIBR	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+417.9%	−39.5%	CIBR	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	23.7%	36.4%	CIBR	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	15.9%	24.3%	CIBR	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−33.9%	−79.9%	CIBR	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.66	0.05	CIBR	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.99	0.08	CIBR	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.48	−0.03	CIBR	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 588 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CIBR KWEB

Only in one fund ↓

Only in CIBR

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.46%

Fortinet, Inc. 7.89%

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 7.66%

Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.35%

Broadcom Inc. 6.74%

Okta, Inc. 4.49%

Zscaler, Inc. 4.41%

Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 3.92%

Only in KWEB

TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 9.90%

ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.70%

PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.45%

MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.40%

NETEASE INC 6.54%

KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.97%

LENOVO GROUP LTD 4.59%

JD.COM INC-CLASS A 4.16%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: CIBR vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	CIBR	KWEB
3 months	+21.5%	−17.3%
6 months	+59.2%	−17.9%
1 year	+39.0%	−40.6%
3 years	+149.7%	−3.2%
Since launchNot the same days: CIBR Jul 2015 · KWEB Aug 2013	+472.8%	+12.7%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF · Holds 45 stocks in cybersecurity, 61% of its weight in S&P 500 companies KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Holds 45 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer First Trust KraneShares

Theme Cybersecurity Internet and e-commerce

In the S&P 500 60.8% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 90.9% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 48.3% 8.4%

Holdings 45 45

Top ten, share of the fund 57.4% 61.5%

Expense ratio 0.58% 0.69%

Fee for the differing part 0.64% 0.69%

Total return, 1 year +39.0% −40.6%

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −1.9% −73.4%

Net assets, CIBR as of Oct 27, 2026 and KWEB as of Oct 28, 2026 $19.0bn $4.3bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-5758AB75B7

CIBR and KWEB are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

Theme. CIBR covers Cybersecurity and KWEB covers Internet and e-commerce.
What each follows. CIBR follows Cybersecurity and KWEB follows Internet and e-commerce.
Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

About each fund

CIBR

By weight, 61% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +39.0% with distributions reinvested.

KWEB

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −40.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 73.4% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do CIBR and KWEB hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or KWEB?: CIBR has 61% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CIBR or KWEB?: CIBR charges 0.58% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CIBR vs FDN CIBR vs SIL CIBR vs XT CIBR vs XME KWEB vs DRAM KWEB vs GDX KWEB vs IGF KWEB vs XBI

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CIBR on its own →KWEB on its own →CIBR dividend history →CIBR holdings →KWEB dividend history →KWEB holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CIBR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CIBR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

First Trust page for CIBR ↗

KWEB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

KWEB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

KraneShares page for KWEB ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CIBR against KWEB, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-kweb

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.