Do IGF and KWEB hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, IGF or KWEB?

IGF has 32% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, IGF or KWEB?

IGF charges 0.37% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so IGF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live Compare their flows Ask about these two funds

IGF vs KWEB: which is really different?

IGF and KWEB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IGF returned +5.3% over the year. iShares Global Infrastructure ETF and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF.

IGF costs 0.32 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 41.4 points; IGF is 2.4 times larger.

	IGF	KWEB
Expense ratio	0.37%	0.69%
Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026	$10.3bn	$4.4bn
Total return, 1 year	+5.3%	−36.1%
What it tracks	Infrastructure	Internet and e-commerce
Holdings in common	0%
S&P 500, total return, 1 year	+17.3%
Against the S&P 500, 1 year	behind by 11.9 pts	behind by 53.3 pts
Below its all-time high	8.3%, high on Feb 27, 2026	71.1%, high on Feb 17, 2021

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

31.9%

IGF in the S&P 500

0.0%

KWEB in the S&P 500

+5.3%

IGF total return, 1 year

−36.1%

KWEB total return, 1 year

IGF · 1 year to Oct 9, 202668% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

32% of IGF's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 68% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

KWEB · 1 year to Oct 9, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 8, 2026.

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · KWEB scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

IGF 54.1

KWEB 92.3

0.1, the lowest in this set92.3, the highest

A percentile among the 391 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IGF and KWEB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding IGF KWEB

Only in IGF

TRANSURBAN GROUP STAPLED UNITS 4.83%

AENA SME SA 4.73%

NEXTERA ENERGY 4.70%

IBERDROLA 4.14%

GRUPO AEROPORTUARIO DEL PACIFICO A 3.63%

ENBRIDGE 3.60%

AUCKLAND INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT 3.55%

WILLIAMS 3.08%

Only in KWEB

TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 10.13%

ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.59%

PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.39%

MEITUAN-CLASS B 6.93%

NETEASE INC 6.59%

LENOVO GROUP LTD 5.92%

KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.55%

JD.COM INC-CLASS A 4.01%

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	IGF	KWEB	IGF	KWEB	IGF	KWEB
3 months	−6.2%	−5.5%	−9.6 pts	−8.9 pts	−9.9 pts	−9.2 pts
6 months	−7.3%	−13.1%	−22.4 pts	−28.3 pts	−30.5 pts	−36.3 pts
1 year	+5.3%	−36.1%	−11.9 pts	−53.3 pts	−18.2 pts	−59.6 pts
3 years	+62.1%	−2.5%	−23.6 pts	−88.3 pts	−45.1 pts	−109.8 pts
Since launch IGF Dec 2007 · KWEB Aug 2013	+129.4%	+22.2%	−508.6 pts	−448.6 pts	−1,460.7 pts	−972.1 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

IGF

iShares Global Infrastructure ETF · Holds 78 stocks in infrastructure, 32% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Holds 44 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer iShares KraneShares

Theme Infrastructure Internet and e-commerce

In the S&P 500 31.9% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 98.3% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 7.2% 8.4%

Holdings 78 44

Top ten, share of the fund 38.0% 61.7%

Expense ratio 0.37% 0.69%

Fee for the differing part 0.38% 0.69%

Total return, 1 year +5.3% −36.1%

vs the S&P 500 −11.9 pts −53.3 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −18.2 pts −59.6 pts

Below its high −8.3% −71.1%

Net assets, as of Oct 8, 2026 $10.3bn $4.4bn

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IGF in plain words

By weight, 32% of IGF's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 38% of the fund across 78 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned +5.3% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 11.9 pts. It sits 8.3% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

KWEB in plain words

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 44 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 the fund returned −36.1% with distributions reinvested against +17.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 53.3 pts. It sits 71.1% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do IGF and KWEB hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, IGF or KWEB?: IGF has 32% of its weight in S&P 500 names and KWEB has 0%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, IGF or KWEB?: IGF charges 0.37% a year and KWEB charges 0.69%, so IGF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

IGF vs FDN IGF vs SIL IGF vs XME IGF vs XT KWEB vs PAVE KWEB vs IFRA KWEB vs AIRR KWEB vs IGV

IGF on its own →KWEB on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

IGF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗iShares page for IGF ↗KWEB filings on SEC EDGAR ↗KWEB prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗KraneShares page for KWEB ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, IGF against KWEB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/igf-vs-kweb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.