Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

KWEB vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, KWEB returned −40.6% to PAVE's +11.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about KWEB and PAVE

Net assets: $4.3bn on Oct 28, 2026 for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF, and $13.6bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF.

At a glance
0.0%
KWEB in the S&P 500
62.1%
PAVE in the S&P 500
−40.6%
KWEB total return, 1 year
+11.4%
PAVE total return, 1 year
KWEB · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 62% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 8% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 8% in

0% of KWEB's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 28, 2026.

PAVE · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 38% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
38% of its weight is outside the S&P 50062% of PAVE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 38% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.62%38%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 97% · top ten 32% of the fund · 100 holdings as filed for May 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 6% in38% of its weight is outside the S&P 50062% of PAVE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 38% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.62%38%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 97% · Nasdaq-100: 6% in

62% of PAVE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 38% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PAVE costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 52.0 points; PAVE is 3.0 times larger.

KWEB vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureKWEBPAVE
Return
Total return, 1 year−40.6%+11.4%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high73.4%, high on Feb 17, 202110.9%, high on Jun 25, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksInternet and e-commerceInfrastructure
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.69%0.47%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026$4.5bn$13.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, KWEB and PAVE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 28, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first KWEB PAVE
Only in one fund ↓
Only in KWEB
TENCENT HOLDINGS LTD 9.90%
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LTD 8.70%
PDD HOLDINGS INC 8.45%
MEITUAN-CLASS B 7.40%
NETEASE INC 6.54%
KE HOLDINGS INC-CL A 4.97%
LENOVO GROUP LTD 4.59%
JD.COM INC-CLASS A 4.16%
Only in PAVE
QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 4.18%
CSX Corporation 3.48%
EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 3.30%
HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. 3.27%
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 3.19%
UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.12%
NUCOR CORPORATION 3.10%
ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. 2.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: KWEB vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowKWEBPAVE
3 months−17.3%−3.0%
6 months−17.9%−3.1%
1 year−40.6%+11.4%
3 years−3.2%+92.8%
Since launchNot the same days: KWEB Aug 2013 · PAVE Mar 2017+12.7%+284.2%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF · Holds 45 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies PAVE Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Holds 100 stocks in infrastructure, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Internet and e-commerce Infrastructure
In the S&P 500 0.0% 62.1%
Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 97.2%
In the Nasdaq-100 8.4% 6.2%
Holdings 45 100
Top ten, share of the fund 61.5% 32.3%
Expense ratio 0.69% 0.47%
Fee for the differing part 0.69% 0.48%
Total return, 1 year −40.6% +11.4%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −73.4% −10.9%
Net assets, KWEB as of Oct 28, 2026 and PAVE as of Oct 12, 2026 $4.3bn $13.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

KWEB flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
KWEB

By weight, 0% of KWEB's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 62% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 28, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −40.6% with distributions reinvested. It sits 73.4% below its all-time high of Feb 17, 2021.

PAVE

By weight, 62% of PAVE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +11.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do KWEB and PAVE hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, KWEB or PAVE?
KWEB has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PAVE has 62%, so KWEB differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, KWEB or PAVE?
KWEB charges 0.69% a year and PAVE charges 0.47%, so PAVE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, KWEB against PAVE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/kweb-vs-pave

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.