Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
CIBR vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CIBR returned +39.0% to GDXJ's +14.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CIBR and GDXJ
Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $19.0bn for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF and $7.6bn for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF.
61% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.
0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.
Pair scorecard
GDXJ costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 24.2 points; CIBR is 2.5 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CIBR | GDXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +39.0% | +14.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 33.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Cybersecurity | Gold miners |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +13.4% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | ahead by 1.4 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.52% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $19.0bn | $7.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Jul 17, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 588 weekly returnsCIBR and GDXJ returned about the same: +450.4% and +453.6%. CIBR swung less: 23.7% to 42.5%. CIBR fell less at its worst: −33.9% to −54.1%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CIBR | GDXJ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +450.4% | +453.6% | Tie | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +16.3% | +16.3% | Tie | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +417.9% | +370.9% | CIBR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 23.7% | 42.5% | CIBR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 15.9% | 29.0% | CIBR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −33.9% | −54.1% | CIBR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.66 | 0.52 | CIBR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 0.99 | 0.77 | CIBR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.48 | 0.30 | CIBR | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 588 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CIBR | GDXJ | CIBR | GDXJ |
| 3 months | +21.5% | +9.9% | not measured | +5.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +59.2% | −8.0% | not measured | −15.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +39.0% | +14.8% | not measured | +1.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | +149.7% | +220.2% | not measured | +131.3 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: CIBR Jul 2015 · GDXJ Nov 2009 | +472.8% | +44.9% | not measured | not measured |
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
CIBR and GDXJ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Theme. CIBR covers Cybersecurity and GDXJ covers Gold miners.
- Concentration. The top ten holdings are 57.4% of CIBR and 40.8% of GDXJ, a gap of 16.6 points.
- What each follows. CIBR follows Cybersecurity and GDXJ follows Gold miners.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CIBR
By weight, 61% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +39.0% with distributions reinvested.
GDXJ
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 33.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do CIBR and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CIBR against GDXJ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-gdxj
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). CIBR against GDXJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-gdxj
[CIBR against GDXJ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-gdxj)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.