Data as of .
CIBR vs SHLD: which is really different?
CIBR holds 62.2% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and SHLD 40.5%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: SHLD scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and SHLD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CIBR | Only in SHLD |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 9.10% | PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC-A 10.28% |
| Fortinet, Inc. 8.72% | RTX CORPORATION 9.40% |
| CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.66% | GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 8.73% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 6.76% | LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP 8.26% |
| Broadcom Inc. 6.12% | NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 7.86% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 4.87% | BAE SYSTEMS PLC 4.54% |
| Okta, Inc. 4.20% | HANWHA AEROSPACE CO LTD 4.04% |
| Zscaler, Inc. 3.36% | RHEINMETALL AG 3.82% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 10, 2026 and Sep 11, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | SHLD | CIBR | SHLD | CIBR | SHLD | |
| 3 months | +10.7% | −2.9% | +7.4 pts | −6.2 pts | +11.5 pts | −2.1 pts |
| 6 months | +45.3% | −18.1% | +29.3 pts | −34.1 pts | +24.6 pts | −38.8 pts |
| 1 year | +25.6% | −4.8% | +8.1 pts | −22.4 pts | +2.6 pts | −27.8 pts |
| 3 years | +103.7% | not published | +25.8 pts | not published | +8.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +401.1% | +153.8% | +60.0 pts | +76.2 pts | −217.5 pts | +59.5 pts |
| CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF Holds 43 stocks in cybersecurity, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | SHLD Global X Defense Tech ETF Holds 52 stocks in defense, 40% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Theme | Cybersecurity | Defense |
| In the S&P 500 | 62.2% | 40.5% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 90.8% | 99.1% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 48.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 43 | 52 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 57.7% | 64.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.64% | 0.50% |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.6% | −4.8% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +8.1 pts | −22.4 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +2.6 pts | −27.8 pts |
| Below its high | −7.6% | −20.6% |
CIBR in plain words
By weight, 62% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 43 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 8.1 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
SHLD in plain words
By weight, 40% of SHLD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 52 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 11, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned −4.8% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 22.4 pts. It sits 20.6% below its all-time high of Mar 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or SHLD?
- CIBR has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and SHLD has 40%, so SHLD differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CIBR or SHLD?
- CIBR charges 0.58% a year and SHLD charges 0.50%, so SHLD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIBR against SHLD, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-shld Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.