Do DRAM and GDXJ hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or GDXJ?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDXJ has 0%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or GDXJ?

DRAM charges 0.65% a year and GDXJ charges 0.52%, so GDXJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and GDXJ hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and GDXJ

Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF, and $7.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF.

DRAM on its own →GDXJ on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

0.0%

GDXJ in the S&P 500

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

+14.8%

GDXJ total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

GDXJ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.

Pair scorecard

GDXJ costs 0.13 points a year less; DRAM is 2.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

DRAM vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	GDXJ
Return
Measure	DRAM	GDXJ
Total return, 1 year	not published	+14.8%
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	GDXJ
Below its all-time high	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026	33.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	DRAM	GDXJ
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Gold miners
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year		+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 year		ahead by 1.4 pts
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	GDXJ
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.52%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$19.2bn	$7.6bn
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	GDXJ
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM GDXJ

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in GDXJ

Alamos Gold Inc 6.86%

Equinox Gold Corp 6.08%

Coeur Mining Inc 5.92%

Endeavour Mining Plc 5.76%

Iamgold Corp 5.19%

Industrias Penoles Sab De Cv 2.58%

First Majestic Silver Corp 2.27%

Hecla Mining Co 2.26%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	DRAM	GDXJ	DRAM	GDXJ
3 months	+20.7%	+9.9%	not measured	+5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months	+41.6%	−8.0%	not measured	−15.4 pts vs ACWI
1 year	–	+14.8%	–	+1.4 pts vs ACWI
3 years	–	+220.2%	–	+131.3 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · GDXJ Nov 2009	+95.0%	+44.9%	not measured	not measured

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF · Holds 156 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill VanEck

Theme Memory and storage Gold miners

In the S&P 500 15.7% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 0.0%

Holdings 12 156

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 40.8%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.52%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.52%

Total return, 1 year +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) +14.8%

vs its benchmark not measured +1.4 pts vs ACWI

Below its high −33.0% −33.1%

Net assets, DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 and GDXJ as of Oct 27, 2026 $20.6bn $7.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

GDXJ

By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 33.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and GDXJ hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or GDXJ?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDXJ has 0%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or GDXJ?: DRAM charges 0.65% a year and GDXJ charges 0.52%, so GDXJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs GDX DRAM vs PPA DRAM vs SHLD DRAM vs XBI GDXJ vs GRID GDXJ vs SMH GDXJ vs FDN GDXJ vs KWEB

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →GDXJ on its own →DRAM holdings →GDXJ dividend history →GDXJ holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

GDXJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

GDXJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

VanEck website ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against GDXJ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-gdxj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.