Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

FDN vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDN returned −1.1% to GDXJ's +14.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FDN and GDXJ

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $5.1bn for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund and $7.6bn for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
81.9%
FDN in the S&P 500
0.0%
GDXJ in the S&P 500
−1.1%
FDN total return, 1 year
+14.8%
GDXJ total return, 1 year
FDN · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 18% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
18% of its weight is outside the S&P 50082% of FDN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.82%18%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 61% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 60% in18% of its weight is outside the S&P 50082% of FDN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.82%18%in the S&P 50018% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 86% · Nasdaq-100: 60% in

82% of FDN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

GDXJ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 41% of the fund · 156 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 22, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in100% of its weight is outside the S&P 5000% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.0%100%0% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FDN costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.9 points; GDXJ is 1.5 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FDN vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureFDNGDXJ
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.1%+14.8%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high6.3%, high on Oct 9, 202633.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksInternet and e-commerceGold miners
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 14.8 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+13.7%+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 14.8 ptsahead by 1.4 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.52%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.1bn$7.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Nov 20, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026 · 883 weekly returns
FDN GDXJ
Return
Total return edge FDN +1,085.9% +31.1%
Annualized edge FDN +15.7% +1.6%
Price return edge FDN +1,083.8% −7.2%
Risk
Volatility edge FDN 22.9% 42.7%
Max drawdown edge FDN −53.4% −88.3%
Downside capture 113.1% 97.3%
Beta 1.15 0.99
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FDN 0.68 0.22
Sortino edge FDN 1.02 0.31
Treynor 0.121 0.095
Calmar edge FDN 0.29 0.02
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.8% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.64 −0.01
Information ratio 0.26 0.00
Tracking error 13.2% 39.5%

Each against its own benchmark: FDN against IVV, Jun 30, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026; GDXJ against ACWI, Nov 20, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FDN returned more: +1,085.9% to +31.1%. FDN swung less: 22.9% to 42.7%. FDN fell less at its worst: −53.4% to −88.3%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FDN vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureFDNGDXJEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,085.9%+31.1%FDNPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+15.7%+1.6%FDNTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,083.8%−7.2%FDNPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.9%42.7%FDNSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation15.4%30.0%FDNLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−53.4%−88.3%FDNDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture138.3%72.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture113.1%97.3%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.150.99Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.710.14Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.680.22FDNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.020.31FDNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.095Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.290.02FDNAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.8% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.64−0.01Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.8% to +7.4%−19.0% to +18.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.00Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error13.2%39.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 883 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FDN and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FDN GDXJ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FDN
Amazon.com, Inc. 10.23%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 9.68%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 9.04%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.48%
Netflix, Inc. 5.28%
Salesforce, Inc. 4.53%
Arista Networks, Inc. 4.45%
Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.39%
Only in GDXJ
Alamos Gold Inc 6.86%
Equinox Gold Corp 6.08%
Coeur Mining Inc 5.92%
Endeavour Mining Plc 5.76%
Iamgold Corp 5.19%
Industrias Penoles Sab De Cv 2.58%
First Majestic Silver Corp 2.27%
Hecla Mining Co 2.26%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: FDN vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowFDNGDXJFDNGDXJ
3 months+5.5%+9.9%−0.6 pts vs IVV+5.5 pts vs ACWI
6 months+7.7%−8.0%−1.4 pts vs IVV−15.4 pts vs ACWI
1 year−1.1%+14.8%−14.8 pts vs IVV+1.4 pts vs ACWI
3 years+89.6%+220.2%−5.8 pts vs IVV+131.3 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: FDN Jun 2006 · GDXJ Nov 2009+1,282.2%+44.9%not measurednot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund · Holds 41 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 82% of its weight in S&P 500 companies GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF · Holds 156 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Internet and e-commerce Gold miners
In the S&P 500 81.9% 0.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 85.5% 100.0%
In the Nasdaq-100 60.0% 0.0%
Holdings 41 156
Top ten, share of the fund 61.1% 40.8%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.52%
Fee for the differing part 0.57% 0.52%
Total return, 1 year −1.1% +14.8%
vs its benchmark −14.8 pts vs IVV +1.4 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −6.3% −33.1%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.1bn $7.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-BFEB950D14

FDN and GDXJ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. FDN covers Internet and e-commerce and GDXJ covers Gold miners.
  2. Concentration. The top ten holdings are 61.1% of FDN and 40.8% of GDXJ, a gap of 20.3 points.
  3. What each follows. FDN follows Internet and e-commerce and GDXJ follows Gold miners.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FDN and GDXJ flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FDN

By weight, 82% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 14.8 pts. It sits 6.3% below its all-time high of Oct 9, 2026.

GDXJ

By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 33.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do FDN and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDN or GDXJ?
FDN has 82% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDXJ has 0%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FDN or GDXJ?
FDN charges 0.49% a year and GDXJ charges 0.52%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FDN against GDXJ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdn-vs-gdxj

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.