Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

FDN vs GDX: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FDN returned −1.1% to GDX's +19.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about FDN and GDX

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $5.1bn for First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund and $25.6bn for VanEck Gold Miners ETF.

At a glance
81.9%
FDN in the S&P 500
11.7%
GDX in the S&P 500
−1.1%
FDN total return, 1 year
+19.0%
GDX total return, 1 year
FDN · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 18% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
18% of its weight is outside the S&P 50082% of FDN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.82%18%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesoutside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 61% of the fund · 41 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 60% in18% of its weight is outside the S&P 50082% of FDN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.82%18%in the S&P 50018% of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 86% · Nasdaq-100: 60% in

82% of FDN's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 18% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

GDX · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 88% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
88% of its weight is outside the S&P 50012% of GDX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.12%88%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · top ten 60% of the fund · 59 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 22, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in88% of its weight is outside the S&P 50012% of GDX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.12%88%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 100% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

12% of GDX's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 88% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.

Pair scorecard

FDN costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 20.1 points; GDX is 5.0 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

FDN vs GDX: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureFDNGDX
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.1%+19.0%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high6.3%, high on Oct 9, 202627.5%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksInternet and e-commerceGold miners
Against the S&P 500, 1 yearbehind by 14.8 pts
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+13.7%+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 14.8 ptsahead by 5.6 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.49%0.51%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$5.1bn$25.6bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jun 30, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026 · 1,060 weekly returns
FDN GDX
Return
Total return edge FDN +1,228.8% +150.9%
Annualized edge FDN +13.5% +4.6%
Price return edge FDN +1,223.1% +107.2%
Risk
Volatility edge FDN 24.1% 38.3%
Max drawdown edge FDN −59.4% −79.2%
Downside capture 113.1% 74.9%
Beta 1.15 0.76
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge FDN 0.58 0.27
Sortino edge FDN 0.85 0.39
Treynor 0.121 0.127
Calmar edge FDN 0.23 0.06
Against the benchmark
Alpha +1.8% a year +3.4% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.64 0.41
Information ratio 0.26 0.04
Tracking error 13.2% 36.4%

Each against its own benchmark: FDN against IVV, Jun 30, 2006 to Oct 23, 2026; GDX against ACWI, Apr 4, 2008 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

FDN returned more: +1,228.8% to +150.9%. FDN swung less: 24.1% to 38.3%. FDN fell less at its worst: −59.4% to −79.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: FDN vs GDX: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureFDNGDXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+1,228.8%+150.9%FDNPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+13.5%+4.6%FDNTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+1,223.1%+107.2%FDNPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility24.1%38.3%FDNSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation16.4%26.4%FDNLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−59.4%−79.2%FDNDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture138.3%50.2%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture113.1%74.9%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.150.76Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.710.13Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.580.27FDNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.850.39FDNReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1210.127Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.230.06FDNAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIVVACWIThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+1.8% a year+3.4% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.640.41Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−3.8% to +7.4%−13.0% to +19.9%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.260.04Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error13.2%36.4%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 1,060 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, FDN and GDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first FDN GDX
Only in one fund ↓
Only in FDN
Amazon.com, Inc. 10.23%
Meta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) 9.68%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 9.04%
Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 5.48%
Netflix, Inc. 5.28%
Salesforce, Inc. 4.53%
Arista Networks, Inc. 4.45%
Alphabet Inc. (Class C) 4.39%
Only in GDX
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 11.45%
Newmont Corp 11.42%
Barrick Mining Corp 8.07%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.50%
Franco-Nevada Corp 5.33%
Anglogold Ashanti Plc 4.78%
Gold Fields Ltd 3.96%
Kinross Gold Corp 3.88%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: FDN vs GDX: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowFDNGDXFDNGDX
3 months+5.5%+14.1%−0.6 pts vs IVV+9.7 pts vs ACWI
6 months+7.7%−2.6%−1.4 pts vs IVV−10.0 pts vs ACWI
1 year−1.1%+19.0%−14.8 pts vs IVV+5.6 pts vs ACWI
3 years+89.6%+197.7%−5.8 pts vs IVV+108.8 pts vs ACWI
Since launchNot the same days: FDN Jun 2006 · GDX May 2006+1,282.2%+173.0%not measurednot measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

FDN First Trust Dow Jones Internet Index Fund · Holds 41 stocks in internet and e-commerce, 82% of its weight in S&P 500 companies GDX VanEck Gold Miners ETF · Holds 59 stocks in gold miners, 12% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Internet and e-commerce Gold miners
In the S&P 500 81.9% 11.7%
Active share vs the S&P 500 85.5% 99.8%
In the Nasdaq-100 60.0% 0.0%
Holdings 41 59
Top ten, share of the fund 61.1% 60.1%
Expense ratio 0.49% 0.51%
Fee for the differing part 0.57% 0.51%
Total return, 1 year −1.1% +19.0%
vs its benchmark −14.8 pts vs IVV +5.6 pts vs ACWI
Below its high −6.3% −27.5%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $5.1bn $25.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-8C8E007370

FDN and GDX are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. FDN covers Internet and e-commerce and GDX covers Gold miners.
  2. What each follows. FDN follows Internet and e-commerce and GDX follows Gold miners.
  3. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

FDN and GDX flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
FDN

By weight, 82% of FDN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 41 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −1.1% with distributions reinvested against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 14.8 pts. It sits 6.3% below its all-time high of Oct 9, 2026.

GDX

By weight, 12% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 60% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.0% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 5.6 pts. It sits 27.5% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do FDN and GDX hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, FDN or GDX?
FDN has 82% of its weight in S&P 500 names and GDX has 12%, so GDX differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, FDN or GDX?
FDN charges 0.49% a year and GDX charges 0.51%, so FDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, FDN against GDX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fdn-vs-gdx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.