Data as of .
CIBR vs DRAM: which is really different?
CIBR holds 62.2% of its weight in S&P 500 companies and DRAM 20.0%.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: DRAM scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 371 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and DRAM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CIBR | Only in DRAM |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 9.10% | TREASURY BILL 27.17% |
| Fortinet, Inc. 8.72% | SK hynix Inc 20.19% |
| CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.66% | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 18.26% |
| Cisco Systems, Inc. 6.76% | Sandisk Corp 6.62% |
| Broadcom Inc. 6.12% | Kioxia Holdings Corp 5.54% |
| Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 4.87% | Western Digital Corp 5.46% |
| Okta, Inc. 4.20% | Seagate Technology Holdings PL 5.32% |
| Zscaler, Inc. 3.36% | GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.90% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 10, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | DRAM | CIBR | DRAM | CIBR | DRAM | |
| 3 months | +10.7% | −9.1% | +7.4 pts | −12.4 pts | +11.5 pts | −8.3 pts |
| 6 months | +45.3% | not published | +29.3 pts | not published | +24.6 pts | not published |
| 1 year | +25.6% | not published | +8.1 pts | not published | +2.6 pts | not published |
| 3 years | +103.7% | not published | +25.8 pts | not published | +8.6 pts | not published |
| Since launch | +401.1% | +112.9% | +60.0 pts | +96.1 pts | −217.5 pts | +90.6 pts |
| CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF Holds 43 stocks in cybersecurity, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF Holds 13 stocks in memory and storage, 20% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Roundhill |
| Theme | Cybersecurity | Memory and storage |
| In the S&P 500 | 62.2% | 20.0% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 90.8% | 96.8% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 48.1% | 20.0% |
| Holdings | 43 | 13 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 57.7% | 97.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.58% | 0.65% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.64% | 0.67% |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.6% | +112.9% (since launch on Apr 2, 2026) |
| vs the S&P 500 | +8.1 pts | +96.1 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +2.6 pts | +90.6 pts |
| Below its high | −7.6% | −26.8% |
CIBR in plain words
By weight, 62% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 43 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 8.1 pts. It sits 7.6% below its all-time high of Aug 13, 2026.
DRAM in plain words
By weight, 20% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 97% of the fund across 13 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it launched on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +112.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.8% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 96.1 pts. It sits 26.8% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or DRAM?
- CIBR has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 20%, so DRAM differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CIBR or DRAM?
- CIBR charges 0.58% a year and DRAM charges 0.65%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CIBR against DRAM, data as of Sep 11, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-dram Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.