Do CIBR and DRAM hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or DRAM?

CIBR has 61% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 16%, so DRAM differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CIBR or DRAM?

CIBR charges 0.58% a year and DRAM charges 0.65%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

CIBR vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

CIBR and DRAM hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CIBR and DRAM

Net assets: $19.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF, and $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF.

CIBR on its own →DRAM on its own →

At a glance

60.8%

CIBR in the S&P 500

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

+39.0%

CIBR total return, 1 year

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

CIBR · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 39% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

61% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CIBR costs 0.07 points a year less.

CIBR vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	CIBR	DRAM
Return
Measure	CIBR	DRAM
Total return, 1 year	+39.0%	not published
Drawdown
Measure	CIBR	DRAM
Below its all-time high		33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	CIBR	DRAM
What it tracks	Cybersecurity	Memory and storage
Cost and size
Measure	CIBR	DRAM
Expense ratio	0.58%	0.65%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$19.0bn	$19.2bn
Holdings
Measure	CIBR	DRAM
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, CIBR and DRAM hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CIBR DRAM

Only in one fund ↓

Only in CIBR

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.46%

Fortinet, Inc. 7.89%

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 7.66%

Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.35%

Broadcom Inc. 6.74%

Okta, Inc. 4.49%

Zscaler, Inc. 4.41%

Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 3.92%

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: CIBR vs DRAM: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	CIBR	DRAM
3 months	+21.5%	+20.7%
6 months	+59.2%	+41.6%
1 year	+39.0%	–
3 years	+149.7%	–
Since launchNot the same days: CIBR Jul 2015 · DRAM Apr 2026	+472.8%	+95.0%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF · Holds 45 stocks in cybersecurity, 61% of its weight in S&P 500 companies DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer First Trust Roundhill

Theme Cybersecurity Memory and storage

In the S&P 500 60.8% 15.7%

Active share vs the S&P 500 90.9% 96.8%

In the Nasdaq-100 48.3% 15.7%

Holdings 45 12

Top ten, share of the fund 57.4% 56.4%

Expense ratio 0.58% 0.65%

Fee for the differing part 0.64% 0.67%

Total return, 1 year +39.0% +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026)

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −1.9% −33.0%

Net assets, CIBR as of Oct 27, 2026 and DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 $19.0bn $20.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

CIBR

By weight, 61% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +39.0% with distributions reinvested.

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do CIBR and DRAM hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CIBR or DRAM?: CIBR has 61% of its weight in S&P 500 names and DRAM has 16%, so DRAM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CIBR or DRAM?: CIBR charges 0.58% a year and DRAM charges 0.65%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CIBR vs GDX CIBR vs IGV CIBR vs PAVE CIBR vs ITA DRAM vs ARKG DRAM vs DISK DRAM vs HBMX DRAM vs IGV

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →CIBR on its own →DRAM on its own →CIBR dividend history →CIBR holdings →DRAM holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

CIBR filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

CIBR prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

First Trust page for CIBR ↗

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CIBR against DRAM, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cibr-vs-dram

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.