Do DRAM and IGV hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or IGV?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 80%, so DRAM differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or IGV?

DRAM charges 0.65% a year and IGV charges 0.38%, so IGV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and IGV hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and IGV

Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF, and $14.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF.

DRAM on its own →IGV on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

80.3%

IGV in the S&P 500

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

−4.1%

IGV total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

IGV · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 20% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

80% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 20% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

Pair scorecard

IGV costs 0.27 points a year less; DRAM is 1.3 times larger.

DRAM vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	IGV
Return
Measure	DRAM	IGV
Total return, 1 year	not published	−4.1%
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	IGV
Below its all-time high	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	DRAM	IGV
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Cloud and software
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	IGV
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.38%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$19.2bn	$14.4bn
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	IGV
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Apr 10, 2026 to Oct 23, 2026 · 28 weekly returns

DRAM IGV

Return

Total return edge IGV (slight) +45.1% +48.1%

Price return edge IGV (slight) +45.1% +48.1%

Risk

Max drawdown edge IGV −39.4% −13.4%

Reading

IGV returned slightly more: +48.1% to +45.1%. IGV fell less at its worst: −13.4% to −39.4%.

Full scorecard

3 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: DRAM vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	IGV	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+45.1%	+48.1%	IGV (slight)	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Price return	+45.1%	+48.1%	IGV (slight)	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Max drawdown	−39.4%	−13.4%	IGV	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 28 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and IGV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM IGV

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in IGV

PALO ALTO NETWORKS 9.30%

PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 9.10%

CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 8.55%

MICROSOFT 8.39%

ORACLE 6.27%

SERVICENOW 4.85%

SALESFORCE 4.05%

FORTINET 3.76%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	DRAM	IGV
3 months	+20.7%	+21.2%
6 months	+41.6%	+32.5%
1 year	–	−4.1%
3 years	–	+70.0%
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · IGV Jul 2001	+95.0%	+1,015.0%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF · Holds 108 stocks in cloud and software, 80% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill iShares

Theme Memory and storage Cloud and software

In the S&P 500 15.7% 80.3%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 92.4%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 65.1%

Holdings 12 108

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 60.7%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.38%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.41%

Total return, 1 year +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) −4.1%

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −33.0% −5.0%

Net assets, DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 and IGV as of Oct 27, 2026 $20.6bn $14.4bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief

No client brief for this pair: ETFIQ prints no one-year total return for DRAM; the two funds' holdings are dated 119 days apart.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

IGV

By weight, 80% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and IGV hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or IGV?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and IGV has 80%, so DRAM differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or IGV?: DRAM charges 0.65% a year and IGV charges 0.38%, so IGV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs SOXX DRAM vs SMH DRAM vs ITA DRAM vs GRID IGV vs PAVE IGV vs ITA IGV vs GRID IGV vs SOXX

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →IGV on its own →DRAM holdings →IGV dividend history →IGV holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

IGV filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

IGV prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for IGV ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against IGV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-igv

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.