Do DRAM and ITA hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or ITA?

DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ITA has 81%, so ITA differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, DRAM or ITA?

DRAM charges 0.65% a year and ITA charges 0.37%, so ITA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

DRAM vs ITA: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

DRAM and ITA hold 0% of their weight in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about DRAM and ITA

Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for Roundhill Memory ETF, and $12.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF.

DRAM on its own →ITA on its own →

At a glance

15.7%

DRAM in the S&P 500

80.8%

ITA in the S&P 500

+95.0%

DRAM total return, since launch, Apr 2, 2026

−4.3%

ITA total return, 1 year

DRAM · 6 months to Oct 28, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

16% of DRAM's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

ITA · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 19% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

81% of ITA's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 19% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

Pair scorecard

ITA costs 0.28 points a year less; DRAM is 1.6 times larger.

DRAM vs ITA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	DRAM	ITA
Return
Measure	DRAM	ITA
Total return, 1 year	not published	−4.3%
Drawdown
Measure	DRAM	ITA
Below its all-time high	33.0%, high on Jun 22, 2026	17.9%, high on Aug 14, 2026
Benchmark
Measure	DRAM	ITA
What it tracks	Memory and storage	Defense
Cost and size
Measure	DRAM	ITA
Expense ratio	0.65%	0.37%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026	$19.2bn	$12.0bn
Holdings
Measure	DRAM	ITA
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, DRAM and ITA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first DRAM ITA

Only in one fund ↓

Only in DRAM

SK hynix Inc 15.89%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 14.37%

Sandisk Corp 5.21%

Kioxia Holdings Corp 4.36%

Western Digital Corp 4.30%

Seagate Technology Holdings PL 4.19%

GigaDevice Semiconductor Inc 3.07%

Micron Technology Inc 2.03%

Only in ITA

GE AEROSPACE 20.09%

RTX 17.06%

BOEING 6.81%

LOCKHEED MARTIN 5.66%

NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP 5.09%

GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP 4.79%

TRANSDIGM GROUP 4.78%

HONEYWELL AEROSPACE INC 4.16%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: DRAM vs ITA: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return
Window	DRAM	ITA
3 months	+20.7%	−12.0%
6 months	+41.6%	−2.4%
1 year	–	−4.3%
3 years	–	+97.8%
Since launchNot the same days: DRAM Apr 2026 · ITA May 2006	+95.0%	+892.2%

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF · Holds 12 stocks in memory and storage, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies ITA iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF · Holds 51 stocks in defense, 81% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill iShares

Theme Memory and storage Defense

In the S&P 500 15.7% 80.8%

Active share vs the S&P 500 96.8% 97.7%

In the Nasdaq-100 15.7% 2.7%

Holdings 12 51

Top ten, share of the fund 56.4% 76.1%

Expense ratio 0.65% 0.37%

Fee for the differing part 0.67% 0.38%

Total return, 1 year +95.0% (since launch, Apr 2, 2026) −4.3%

vs its benchmark not measured not measured

Below its high −33.0% −17.9%

Net assets, DRAM as of Oct 28, 2026 and ITA as of Oct 27, 2026 $20.6bn $12.0bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

DRAM

By weight, 16% of DRAM's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 12 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Since it first traded on Apr 2, 2026 the fund returned +95.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 33.0% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.

ITA

By weight, 81% of ITA's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 76% of the fund across 51 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −4.3% with distributions reinvested. It sits 17.9% below its all-time high of Aug 14, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do DRAM and ITA hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, DRAM or ITA?: DRAM has 16% of its weight in S&P 500 names and ITA has 81%, so ITA differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, DRAM or ITA?: DRAM charges 0.65% a year and ITA charges 0.37%, so ITA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

DRAM vs SHLD DRAM vs XAR DRAM vs IDEF DRAM vs PPA ITA vs PAVE ITA vs GRID ITA vs SOXX ITA vs SMH

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →DRAM on its own →ITA on its own →DRAM holdings →ITA dividend history →ITA holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

DRAM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

DRAM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Roundhill page for DRAM ↗

ITA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

ITA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

iShares page for ITA ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DRAM against ITA, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/dram-vs-ita

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.