Data as of .
CCSO vs FAN: which is really different?
CCSO and FAN hold 5% of their weight in the same names, and FAN returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: FAN scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
5% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CCSO and FAN hold 5% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CCSO | FAN |
|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova Inc | 7.71% | 2.12% |
| Enlight Renewable Energy Ltd | 3.00% | 1.66% |
| ReNew Energy Global PLC | 0.16% | 0.30% |
| Only in CCSO | Only in FAN |
|---|---|
| Quanta Services Inc 7.55% | Nordex SE 8.34% |
| Johnson Controls International 6.04% | Orsted A/S 8.05% |
| Southern Copper Corp 5.98% | Vestas Wind Systems A/S 7.75% |
| Carrier Global Corp 5.17% | EDP Renewables SA 7.44% |
| Waste Management Inc 4.79% | China Longyuan Power Group Corporation L 5.44% |
| Cameco Corp 4.30% | Canadian Dollar 4.66% |
| Republic Services Inc 4.21% | Cadeler A/S 4.13% |
| Nucor Corp 4.13% | ERG SpA 4.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCSO | FAN | CCSO | FAN | CCSO | FAN | |
| 3 months | −11.4% | −5.5% | −13.6 pts | −7.7 pts | −8.9 pts | −3.0 pts |
| 6 months | 0.0% | +1.0% | −18.0 pts | −17.1 pts | −24.2 pts | −23.3 pts |
| 1 year | +2.9% | +26.2% | −13.6 pts | +9.7 pts | −18.8 pts | +4.5 pts |
| 3 years | +34.9% | +57.9% | −43.5 pts | −20.5 pts | −63.3 pts | −40.3 pts |
| Since launch | +30.7% | +110.1% | −78.2 pts | −693.5 pts | −124.9 pts | −1580.2 pts |
| CCSO Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF Holds 119 stocks in clean energy, 48% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF Holds 56 stocks in clean energy, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | Carbon Collective | First Trust |
| Theme | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 47.7% | 6.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 98.7% | 99.2% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 119 | 56 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 53.4% | 56.3% |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.9% | +26.2% |
| vs the S&P 500 | −13.6 pts | +9.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | −18.8 pts | +4.5 pts |
| Below its high | −16.4% | −13.8% |
| Net assets | $47m | $234m |
CCSO in plain words
By weight, 48% of CCSO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 119 positions, as filed for Apr 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +2.9% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 13.6 pts. It sits 16.4% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
FAN in plain words
By weight, 6% of FAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 56 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 9.7 pts. It sits 13.8% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do CCSO and FAN hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 5% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CCSO or FAN?
- CCSO has 48% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FAN has 6%, so FAN differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CCSO or FAN?
- CCSO charges 0.35% a year and FAN charges 0.60%, so CCSO is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CCSO against FAN, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ccso-vs-fan Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.