Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
CCSO vs CNRG: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, CCSO returned −0.2% to CNRG's −14.9%; 14% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about CCSO and CNRGNet assets: $46m on Jul 31, 2026 for Carbon Collective Climate Solutions U.S. Equity ETF, and $167m on Nov 3, 2026 for State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF.
47% of CCSO's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 53% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jul 31, 2026.
28% of CNRG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 72% is outside the index. Holdings as of Nov 3, 2026.
Pair scorecard
CCSO costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.7 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | CCSO | CNRG |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −0.2% | −14.9% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 18.1%, high on Jun 2, 2026 | 40.7%, high on Feb 9, 2021 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| Against the S&P 500, 1 year | behind by 15.0 pts | behind by 29.7 pts |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +14.8% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 15.0 pts | behind by 29.7 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.45% |
| Net assets, CCSO as of Jul 31, 2026 and CNRG as of Nov 3, 2026 | $46m | $167m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 14% | |
Risk and return
Sep 30, 2022 to Oct 30, 2026 · 213 weekly returns · each against VOOFrom Sep 2022 to Oct 2026, CCSO returned more: +38.6% to −5.2%. CCSO swung less: 21.0% to 30.5%. CCSO fell less at its worst: −22.8% to −48.7%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | CCSO | CNRG | VOO | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | |||||
| Total return | +38.6% | −5.2% | CCSO | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. | |
| Annualized | +8.3% | −1.3% | CCSO | Total return as a yearly rate. | |
| Price return | +35.6% | −9.9% | CCSO | Price change alone, distributions left out. | |
| Risk | |||||
| Volatility | 21.0% | 30.5% | CCSO | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. | |
| Downside deviation | 14.1% | 21.1% | CCSO | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. | |
| Max drawdown | −22.8% | −48.7% | CCSO | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. | |
| Upside capture | 96.4% | 104.1% | 100.0% | CNRG (slight) | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. |
| Downside capture | 120.9% | 139.1% | 100.0% | CCSO | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. |
| Beta | 1.13 | 1.28 | 1.00 | CCSO lower | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.60 | 0.36 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | |||||
| Sharpe | 0.27 | −0.04 | CCSO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. | |
| Sortino | 0.39 | −0.06 | CCSO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. | |
| Treynor | 0.049 | −0.010 | 0.161 | CCSO | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. |
| Calmar | 0.36 | −0.03 | CCSO | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. | |
| Against the benchmark | |||||
| Benchmark | VOO | VOO | VOO | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −12.6% a year | −21.9% a year | 0.0% | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.89 | −1.79 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. | |
| Alpha range | −25.8% to +0.5% | −46.0% to +2.2% | Both include zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. | |
| Information ratio | −0.78 | −0.70 | CNRG (slight) | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 13.5% | 24.7% | 0.0% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 213 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, CCSO and CNRG hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Nov 3, 2026.
half
14% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | CCSO | CNRG | CCSO | CNRG |
| 3 months | −10.0% | −13.7% | −9.9 pts vs VOO | −13.6 pts vs VOO |
| 6 months | −16.1% | −24.1% | −21.1 pts vs VOO | −29.1 pts vs VOO |
| 1 year | −0.2% | −14.9% | −15.0 pts vs VOO | −29.7 pts vs VOO |
| 3 years | +43.6% | +31.6% | −39.7 pts vs VOO | −51.7 pts vs VOO |
| Since launchNot the same days: CCSO Sep 2022 · CNRG Oct 2018 | +28.1% | +204.0% | −82.8 pts vs VOO | −13.5 pts vs VOO |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
14% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Client brief:
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
CCSO
By weight, 47% of CCSO's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 121 positions, as filed for Jul 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −0.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Total Return Index, so a holder was behind by 15.0 pts. It sits 18.1% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
CNRG
By weight, 28% of CNRG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 37% of the fund across 38 positions, as published by its issuer for Nov 3, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −14.9% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index, so a holder was behind by 29.7 pts. It sits 40.7% below its all-time high of Feb 9, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do CCSO and CNRG hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, CCSO against CNRG, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ccso-vs-cnrg
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). CCSO against CNRG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ccso-vs-cnrg
[CCSO against CNRG (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/ccso-vs-cnrg)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.