Data as of .
FAN vs HYDR: which is really different?
FAN and HYDR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and HYDR returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: HYDR scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FAN and HYDR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | FAN | HYDR |
|---|---|---|
| Euro | 0.00% | -0.00% |
| Only in FAN | Only in HYDR |
|---|---|
| Nordex SE 8.34% | BLOOM ENERGY CORP- A 16.93% |
| Orsted A/S 8.05% | DOOSAN FUEL CELL CO LTD 11.51% |
| Vestas Wind Systems A/S 7.75% | PLUG POWER INC 9.73% |
| EDP Renewables SA 7.44% | CERES POWER HOLDINGS PLC 7.38% |
| China Longyuan Power Group Corporation L 5.44% | SFC ENERGY AG-BR 6.38% |
| Canadian Dollar 4.66% | FUELCELL ENERGY INC 5.59% |
| Cadeler A/S 4.13% | ITM POWER PLC 4.34% |
| ERG SpA 4.07% | NEL ASA 4.32% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAN | HYDR | FAN | HYDR | FAN | HYDR | |
| 3 months | −5.5% | −19.9% | −7.7 pts | −22.2 pts | −3.0 pts | −17.5 pts |
| 6 months | +1.0% | +21.4% | −17.1 pts | +3.4 pts | −23.3 pts | −2.8 pts |
| 1 year | +26.2% | +37.6% | +9.7 pts | +21.0 pts | +4.5 pts | +15.8 pts |
| 3 years | +57.9% | +17.1% | −20.5 pts | −61.3 pts | −40.3 pts | −81.0 pts |
| Since launch | +110.1% | −60.3% | −693.5 pts | −147.6 pts | −1580.2 pts | −165.0 pts |
| FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF Holds 56 stocks in clean energy, 6% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | HYDR Global X Hydrogen ETF Holds 30 stocks in clean energy, 5% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Global X |
| Theme | Clean energy | Clean energy |
| In the S&P 500 | 6.1% | 5.1% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 99.2% | 99.7% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 56 | 30 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 56.3% | 73.1% |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.60% | 0.50% |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.2% | +37.6% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +9.7 pts | +21.0 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +4.5 pts | +15.8 pts |
| Below its high | −13.8% | −67.1% |
| Net assets | $234m | $98m |
FAN in plain words
By weight, 6% of FAN's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 56% of the fund across 56 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +26.2% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 9.7 pts. It sits 13.8% below its all-time high of May 6, 2026.
HYDR in plain words
By weight, 5% of HYDR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 73% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +37.6% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 21.0 pts. It sits 67.1% below its all-time high of Nov 8, 2021.
Questions people ask
- Do FAN and HYDR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, FAN or HYDR?
- FAN has 6% of its weight in S&P 500 names and HYDR has 5%, so HYDR differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, FAN or HYDR?
- FAN charges 0.60% a year and HYDR charges 0.50%, so HYDR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FAN against HYDR, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/fan-vs-hydr Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.