Data as of .
CARZ vs FMED: which is really different?
CARZ and FMED hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CARZ returned more over the year.
ETFIQ Off-Index Score: FMED scores higher
How much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
A percentile among the 379 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CARZ and FMED hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CARZ | Only in FMED |
|---|---|
| Microsoft Corporation 5.92% | UCB SA 4.75% |
| NVIDIA Corporation 5.06% | LIFESTANCE HEALTH GROUP INC 4.29% |
| Apple Inc. 4.90% | DANAHER CORP 3.43% |
| Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 4.72% | 10X GENOMICS INC 3.12% |
| Micron Technology, Inc. 4.72% | INTUITIVE SURGICAL INC 2.93% |
| Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 4.72% | COGENT BIOSCIENCES INC 2.86% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited (ADR) 4.59% | ALNYLAM PHARMACEUTICALS INC 2.80% |
| Alphabet Inc. (Class A) 4.49% | ARGENX SE 2.79% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Sep 18, 2026.
Performance, window by window
| Window | Total return | vs the S&P 500 | vs the Nasdaq-100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CARZ | FMED | CARZ | FMED | CARZ | FMED | |
| 3 months | −11.3% | +21.3% | −13.5 pts | +19.0 pts | −8.8 pts | +23.7 pts |
| 6 months | +33.3% | +32.3% | +15.3 pts | +14.3 pts | +9.1 pts | +8.0 pts |
| 1 year | +50.4% | +28.3% | +33.9 pts | +11.7 pts | +28.7 pts | +6.5 pts |
| 3 years | +107.6% | +39.6% | +29.2 pts | −38.8 pts | +9.4 pts | −58.5 pts |
| Since launch | +352.9% | +25.8% | −283.1 pts | −57.6 pts | −939.0 pts | −78.1 pts |
| CARZ First Trust S-Network Future Vehicles & Technology ETF Holds 106 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 52% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | FMED Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF Holds 68 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 25% of its weight in S&P 500 companies | |
|---|---|---|
| Issuer | First Trust | Fidelity |
| Theme | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| In the S&P 500 | 51.5% | 25.4% |
| Active share vs the S&P 500 | 74.0% | 97.1% |
| In the Nasdaq-100 | 48.0% | 8.7% |
| Holdings | 106 | 68 |
| Top ten, share of the fund | 47.7% | 31.5% |
| Expense ratio | 0.70% | 0.50% |
| Fee for the differing part | 0.95% | 0.51% |
| Total return, 1 year | +50.4% | +28.3% |
| vs the S&P 500 | +33.9 pts | +11.7 pts |
| vs the Nasdaq-100 | +28.7 pts | +6.5 pts |
| Below its high | −13.6% | −3.8% |
| Net assets | $48m | $52m |
CARZ in plain words
By weight, 52% of CARZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 74%. The top ten holdings are 48% of the fund across 106 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 18, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +50.4% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 33.9 pts. It sits 13.6% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.
FMED in plain words
By weight, 25% of FMED's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 68 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Sep 18, 2026 the fund returned +28.3% with distributions reinvested against +16.6% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 11.7 pts.
Questions people ask
- Do CARZ and FMED hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
- Which is more different from the S&P 500, CARZ or FMED?
- CARZ has 52% of its weight in S&P 500 names and FMED has 25%, so FMED differs more from the index.
- Which is cheaper, CARZ or FMED?
- CARZ charges 0.70% a year and FMED charges 0.50%, so FMED is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CARZ against FMED, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/carz-vs-fmed Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.