CABZ vs WATS: which is really different?

CABZ and WATS hold 9% of their weight in the same names. Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF and Corgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF.

37.6%
CABZ in the S&P 500
28.9%
WATS in the S&P 500
−20.2%
CABZ total return, since launch
−24.9%
WATS total return, since launch
CABZ · 6 months to Sep 30, 202662% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
62% of its weight is outside the S&P 50038% of CABZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 62% is outside the index38%62%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 53% of the fund · 30 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 25% in62% of its weight is outside the S&P 50038% of CABZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 62% is outside the index38%62%in the S&P 500outside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 53% of the fund

38% of CABZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 62% is outside the index

WATS · 3 months to Sep 30, 202671% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
71% of its weight is outside the S&P 50029% of WATS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 71% is outside the index29%71%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 65% of the fund · 24 holdings filed Sep 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 17% in71% of its weight is outside the S&P 50029% of WATS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 71% is outside the index29%71%inoutside the S&P 500active share 98% · top ten 65% of the fund

29% of WATS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 71% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · WATS scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?
0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CABZ and WATS hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

half

9% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding CABZ WATS
Tesla Inc 8.44% 17.02%
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 0.50% 2.74%
Only in CABZ
Alphabet Inc 6.19%
Uber Technologies Inc 5.46%
Baidu Inc 5.25%
WeRide Inc 5.05%
Pony AI Inc 4.72%
Ouster Inc 4.55%
NVIDIA Corp 4.49%
RoboSense Technology Co Ltd 4.31%
Only in WATS
Bloom Energy Corp 12.36%
Enphase Energy Inc 6.12%
EnerSys 5.76%
Energy Vault Holdings Inc 4.58%
AES Corp/The 4.33%
Generac Holdings Inc 4.09%
Sociedad Quimica y Minera de Chile SA 4.01%
Sunrun Inc 3.50%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

9% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

Total returnvs the S&P 500vs the Nasdaq-100
WindowCABZWATSCABZWATSCABZWATS
3 months−17.2%−23.4%−19.7 pts−26.0 pts−19.3 pts−25.6 pts
6 months−3.7%not published−20.7 ptsnot published−30.6 ptsnot published
Since launch
CABZ Jan 2026 · WATS May 2026
−20.2%−24.9%−31.5 pts−29.3 pts−40.0 pts−31.4 pts

CABZ and WATS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CABZ
Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF · Holds 30 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 38% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
WATS
Corgi Battery Energy Storage Systems ETF · Holds 24 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 29% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Roundhill Corgi
Theme Electric vehicles and batteries Electric vehicles and batteries
In the S&P 500 37.6% 28.9%
Active share vs the S&P 500 86.0% 98.1%
In the Nasdaq-100 25.2% 17.0%
Holdings 30 24
Top ten, share of the fund 52.6% 65.2%
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.35%
Fee for the differing part 0.69% 0.36%
Total return, 1 year −20.2% (since launch on Jan 14, 2026) −24.9% (since launch on May 6, 2026)
vs the S&P 500 −31.5 pts −29.3 pts
vs the Nasdaq-100 −40.0 pts −31.4 pts
Below its high −24.7% −38.3%
Net assets $3m $496,218

CABZ and WATS on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CABZ in plain words

By weight, 38% of CABZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Jan 14, 2026 the fund returned −20.2% with distributions reinvested against +11.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 31.5 pts. It sits 24.7% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

WATS in plain words

By weight, 29% of WATS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 65% of the fund across 24 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on May 6, 2026 the fund returned −24.9% with distributions reinvested against +4.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 29.3 pts. It sits 38.3% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do CABZ and WATS hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 9% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CABZ or WATS?
CABZ has 38% of its weight in S&P 500 names and WATS has 29%, so WATS differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CABZ or WATS?
CABZ charges 0.59% a year and WATS charges 0.35%, so WATS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, CABZ against WATS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cabz-vs-wats

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.