Do CABZ and EVMT hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, CABZ or EVMT?

CABZ has 38% of its weight in S&P 500 names and EVMT has 0%, so EVMT differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, CABZ or EVMT?

CABZ charges 0.59% a year and EVMT charges 0.59%, so CABZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

CABZ vs EVMT: which is really different?

CABZ and EVMT hold 0% of their weight in the same names. Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF and Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF.

37.6%

CABZ in the S&P 500

0.0%

EVMT in the S&P 500

−20.2%

CABZ total return, since launch

+20.8%

EVMT total return, 1 year

CABZ · 6 months to Sep 30, 202662% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

38% of CABZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 62% is outside the index

EVMT · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of EVMT's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · EVMT scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

CABZ 20.3

EVMT 92

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CABZ and EVMT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding CABZ EVMT

Only in CABZ

Tesla Inc 8.44%

Alphabet Inc 6.19%

Uber Technologies Inc 5.46%

Baidu Inc 5.25%

WeRide Inc 5.05%

Pony AI Inc 4.72%

Ouster Inc 4.55%

NVIDIA Corp 4.49%

Only in EVMT

Invesco Premier US Government Money Portfolio 79.76%

POWERSHARES CAYMAN FUND 20.24%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	CABZ	EVMT	CABZ	EVMT	CABZ	EVMT
3 months	−17.2%	+0.7%	−19.7 pts	−1.8 pts	−19.3 pts	−1.4 pts
6 months	−3.7%	−2.4%	−20.7 pts	−19.4 pts	−30.6 pts	−29.3 pts
1 year	not published	+20.8%	not published	+5.1 pts	not published	−3.0 pts
3 years	not published	+12.4%	not published	−72.6 pts	not published	−97.6 pts
Since launch CABZ Jan 2026 · EVMT Apr 2022	−20.2%	−27.4%	−31.5 pts	−122.1 pts	−40.0 pts	−167.1 pts

CABZ and EVMT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

CABZ

Roundhill Robotaxi, Autonomous Vehicles & Technology ETF · Holds 30 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 38% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

EVMT

Invesco Electric Vehicle Metals Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF · Holds 2 stocks in electric vehicles and batteries, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill Invesco

Theme Electric vehicles and batteries Electric vehicles and batteries

In the S&P 500 37.6% 0.0%

Active share vs the S&P 500 86.0% 100.0%

In the Nasdaq-100 25.2% 0.0%

Holdings 30 2

Top ten, share of the fund 52.6% 100.0%

Expense ratio 0.59% 0.59%

Fee for the differing part 0.69% 0.59%

Total return, 1 year −20.2% (since launch on Jan 14, 2026) +20.8%

vs the S&P 500 −31.5 pts +5.1 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −40.0 pts −3.0 pts

Below its high −24.7% −28.6%

Net assets $3m $7m

CABZ and EVMT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

CABZ in plain words

By weight, 38% of CABZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 53% of the fund across 30 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Since it launched on Jan 14, 2026 the fund returned −20.2% with distributions reinvested against +11.3% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 31.5 pts. It sits 24.7% below its all-time high of Jun 2, 2026.

EVMT in plain words

By weight, 0% of EVMT's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 100% of the fund across 2 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 5.1 pts. It sits 28.6% below its all-time high of Apr 27, 2022.

Questions people ask

Do CABZ and EVMT hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, CABZ or EVMT?: CABZ has 38% of its weight in S&P 500 names and EVMT has 0%, so EVMT differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, CABZ or EVMT?: CABZ charges 0.59% a year and EVMT charges 0.59%, so CABZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

CABZ vs DRIV CABZ vs ION CABZ vs KARS CABZ vs LIMI EVMT vs FDRV EVMT vs HAIL EVMT vs IDRV EVMT vs ILIT

CABZ on its own →EVMT on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

CABZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗CABZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Roundhill page for CABZ ↗EVMT filings on SEC EDGAR ↗EVMT prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for EVMT ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, CABZ against EVMT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/cabz-vs-evmt

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.