IQ

Data as of Nov 4, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

BUYZ vs LENS: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BUYZ returned −10.3% to LENS's +28.3%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BUYZ and LENS

Net assets: $5.3m on Nov 3, 2026 for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF, and $67m on Aug 31, 2026 for Sarmaya Thematic ETF.

BUYZ on its own →LENS on its own →
At a glance
61.5%
BUYZ in the S&P 500
16.0%
LENS in the S&P 500
−10.3%
BUYZ total return, 1 year
+28.3%
LENS total return, 1 year
BUYZ · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 39% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
39% of its weight is outside the S&P 50062% of BUYZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.62%39%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 86% · top ten 49% of the fund · 58 holdings as filed for Jun 30, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 53% in39% of its weight is outside the S&P 50062% of BUYZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.62%39%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 86% · Nasdaq-100: 53% in

62% of BUYZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.

LENS · 1 year to Nov 4, 2026 84% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of LENS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.16%84%in the S&P 500of its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 40% of the fund · 45 holdings as filed for Aug 31, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 2% in84% of its weight is outside the S&P 50016% of LENS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.16%84%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 2% in

16% of LENS's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 84% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

BUYZ costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 38.6 points.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

BUYZ vs LENS: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureBUYZLENS
Return
Total return, 1 year−10.3%+28.3%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high40.1%, high on Feb 12, 202117.6%, high on Feb 27, 2026
Against its benchmark
What it tracksBroad innovation and megatrendsBroad innovation and megatrends
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year+14.8%+14.3%
Against its benchmark, 1 yearbehind by 25.1 ptsahead by 14.0 pts
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.50%0.79%
Net assets, BUYZ as of Nov 3, 2026 and LENS as of Aug 31, 2026$5.3m$67m
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BUYZ and LENS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BUYZ LENS
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BUYZ
AMAZON.COM INC 10.99%
SHOPIFY INC 8.43%
APPLOVIN CORP 5.31%
ALPHABET INC 4.02%
META PLATFORMS INC 3.88%
CARVANA COMPANY 3.64%
DOORDASH INC 3.29%
EBAY INC 3.26%
Only in LENS
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust 8.14%
iShares Gold Trust Micro 5.23%
Chevron Corp 4.38%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 4.30%
Kinross Gold Corp 3.70%
iShares Silver Trust 3.41%
Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 3.09%
Gold Fields Ltd 3.05%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: BUYZ vs LENS: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total returnvs its benchmark
WindowBUYZLENSBUYZLENS
3 months+1.9%−0.5%+2.2 pts vs IWV−0.3 pts vs BKLC
6 months+5.8%−7.8%+0.9 pts vs IWV−12.7 pts vs BKLC
1 year−10.3%+28.3%−25.1 pts vs IWV+14.0 pts vs BKLC
3 years+47.2%–−33.8 pts vs IWV–
Since launchNot the same days: BUYZ Feb 2020 · LENS Jan 2025+54.0%+68.9%−120.5 pts vs IWV+39.1 pts vs BKLC

– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

BUYZ Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF · Holds 58 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies LENS Sarmaya Thematic ETF · Holds 45 stocks in broad innovation and megatrends, 16% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Issuer Franklin Sarmaya
Theme Broad innovation and megatrends Broad innovation and megatrends
In the S&P 500 61.5% 16.0%
Active share vs the S&P 500 86.3% 98.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 53.2% 1.6%
Holdings 58 45
Top ten, share of the fund 49.2% 40.3%
Expense ratio 0.50% 0.79%
Fee for the differing part 0.58% 0.80%
Total return, 1 year −10.3% +28.3%
vs its benchmark −25.1 pts vs IWV +14.0 pts vs BKLC
Below its high −40.1% −17.6%
Net assets, BUYZ as of Nov 3, 2026 and LENS as of Aug 31, 2026 $5.3m $67m

As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BUYZ

Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −10.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 25.1 pts.

By weight, 62% of BUYZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. It sits 40.1% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.

LENS

By weight, 16% of LENS's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 99%. The top ten holdings are 40% of the fund across 45 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +28.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.3% for its benchmark, the Solactive GBS United States 500 Index, so a holder was ahead by 14.0 pts. It sits 17.6% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do BUYZ and LENS hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BUYZ or LENS?
BUYZ has 62% of its weight in S&P 500 names and LENS has 16%, so LENS differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BUYZ or LENS?
BUYZ charges 0.50% a year and LENS charges 0.79%, so BUYZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
BUYZ vs INVNBUYZ vs HTECBUYZ vs TEKYBUYZ vs DTECLENS vs THMZLENS vs TEKYLENS vs LFSCLENS vs TMAT
Where to next
All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →BUYZ on its own →LENS on its own →BUYZ dividend history →BUYZ holdings →LENS dividend history →LENS holdings →Method →Standards and sources →
Sources and dates
BUYZ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
BUYZ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Franklin website ↗
LENS filings on SEC EDGAR ↗
LENS prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗
Sarmaya page for LENS ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BUYZ against LENS, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buyz-vs-lens

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.