Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
BUYZ vs FMED: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, BUYZ returned −10.3% to FMED's +27.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BUYZ and FMEDNet assets: $5.3m on Nov 3, 2026 for Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF, and $52m on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Disruptive Medicine ETF.
62% of BUYZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Jun 30, 2026.
22% of FMED's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 78% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.50% a year; their one-year returns differ by 37.7 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BUYZ | FMED |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | −10.3% | +27.4% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 40.1%, high on Feb 12, 2021 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 25.1 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.50% | 0.50% |
| Net assets, BUYZ as of Nov 3, 2026 and FMED as of Sep 30, 2026 | $5.3m | $52m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BUYZ and FMED hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BUYZ | FMED | BUYZ | FMED |
| 3 months | +1.9% | +14.9% | +2.2 pts vs IWV | not measured |
| 6 months | +5.8% | +31.2% | +0.9 pts vs IWV | not measured |
| 1 year | −10.3% | +27.4% | −25.1 pts vs IWV | not measured |
| 3 years | +47.2% | +57.8% | −33.8 pts vs IWV | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: BUYZ Feb 2020 · FMED Jun 2023 | +54.0% | +31.7% | −120.5 pts vs IWV | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned −10.3% with distributions reinvested against +14.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index, so a holder was behind by 25.1 pts.
By weight, 62% of BUYZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 86%. The top ten holdings are 49% of the fund across 58 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. It sits 40.1% below its all-time high of Feb 12, 2021.
FMED
By weight, 22% of FMED's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 33% of the fund across 72 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested.
Questions people ask
- Do BUYZ and FMED hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BUYZ against FMED, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buyz-vs-fmed
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). BUYZ against FMED. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buyz-vs-fmed
[BUYZ against FMED (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/buyz-vs-fmed)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.