Do BETZ and NERD hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, BETZ or NERD?

BETZ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NERD has 8%, so BETZ differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, BETZ or NERD?

BETZ charges 0.75% a year and NERD charges 0.50%, so NERD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

BETZ vs NERD: which is really different?

BETZ and NERD hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and NERD returned −20.6% over the year. Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF and Roundhill Video Games ETF.

0.0%

BETZ in the S&P 500

7.8%

NERD in the S&P 500

−28.8%

BETZ total return, 1 year

−20.6%

NERD total return, 1 year

BETZ · 1 year to Sep 30, 2026100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of BETZ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index

NERD · 1 year to Sep 30, 202692% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

8% of NERD's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 92% is outside the index

ETFIQ Off-Index Score · BETZ scores higherHow much of it is not the index it is sold as an alternative to?

BETZ 92

NERD 82.3

0.1, the lowest in this set92.0, the highest

A percentile among the 375 thematic ETFs with a holdings filing. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All thematic ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BETZ and NERD hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Sep 30, 2026.

50%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding BETZ NERD

Only in BETZ

Flutter Entertainment PLC 7.57%

Allwyn AG 6.76%

DraftKings Inc 6.62%

Evolution AB 6.58%

Rush Street Interactive Inc 5.82%

Super Group SGHC Ltd 5.55%

Lottomatica Group Spa 5.34%

Sportradar Group AG 5.00%

Only in NERD

NETEASE INC 12.16%

Nintendo Co Ltd 10.11%

Take-Two Interactive Software Inc 7.76%

ROBLOX Corp 6.66%

Bandai Namco Holdings Inc 5.73%

Konami Group Corp 5.23%

Unity Software Inc 4.93%

Capcom Co Ltd 4.26%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Performance, window by window

	Total return		vs the S&P 500		vs the Nasdaq-100
Window	BETZ	NERD	BETZ	NERD	BETZ	NERD
3 months	−14.3%	+7.5%	−16.8 pts	+5.0 pts	−16.4 pts	+5.4 pts
6 months	−10.5%	+5.3%	−27.5 pts	−11.7 pts	−37.4 pts	−21.6 pts
1 year	−28.8%	−20.6%	−44.5 pts	−36.4 pts	−52.6 pts	−44.4 pts
3 years	+8.0%	+64.7%	−76.9 pts	−20.3 pts	−101.9 pts	−45.3 pts
Since launch BETZ Jun 2020 · NERD Jun 2019	+7.1%	+54.9%	−160.8 pts	−148.6 pts	−219.9 pts	−288.3 pts

BETZ and NERD over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BETZ

Roundhill Sports Betting & iGaming ETF · Holds 23 stocks in gaming, esports and betting, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

NERD

Roundhill Video Games ETF · Holds 43 stocks in gaming, esports and betting, 8% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer Roundhill Roundhill

Theme Gaming, esports and betting Gaming, esports and betting

In the S&P 500 0.0% 7.8%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 99.9%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 7.8%

Holdings 23 43

Top ten, share of the fund 59.0% 63.5%

Expense ratio 0.75% 0.50%

Fee for the differing part 0.75% 0.50%

Total return, 1 year −28.8% −20.6%

vs the S&P 500 −44.5 pts −36.4 pts

vs the Nasdaq-100 −52.6 pts −44.4 pts

Below its high −47.6% −40.7%

Net assets $41m $14m

BETZ and NERD on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BETZ in plain words

By weight, 0% of BETZ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 59% of the fund across 23 positions, as filed for Jun 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −28.8% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 44.5 pts. It sits 47.6% below its all-time high of Apr 27, 2021.

NERD in plain words

By weight, 8% of NERD's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 43 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 30, 2026. Over the year to Sep 30, 2026 the fund returned −20.6% with distributions reinvested against +15.7% for the S&P 500, so a holder was behind by 36.4 pts. It sits 40.7% below its all-time high of Feb 16, 2021.

Questions people ask

Do BETZ and NERD hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight, which is mostly different names. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, BETZ or NERD?: BETZ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and NERD has 8%, so BETZ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, BETZ or NERD?: BETZ charges 0.75% a year and NERD charges 0.50%, so NERD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

BETZ vs HERO BETZ vs ODDZ BETZ vs BNGE BETZ vs ESPO NERD vs ODDZ NERD vs BNGE NERD vs ESPO NERD vs GAMR

BETZ on its own →NERD on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

BETZ and NERD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗BETZ and NERD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Roundhill page for BETZ ↗Roundhill page for NERD ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, BETZ against NERD, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/betz-vs-nerd

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.