Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BAI vs GDXJ: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BAI returned +19.6% to GDXJ's +14.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BAI and GDXJ
Net assets: $13.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF, and $7.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF.
55% of BAI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.
0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.
Pair scorecard
GDXJ costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.8 points; BAI is 1.7 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BAI | GDXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +14.8% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 19.6%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | 33.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026 |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Artificial intelligence | Gold miners |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +47.8% | +13.4% |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 28.2 pts | ahead by 1.4 pts |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.52% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $13.2bn | $7.6bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42% | 41% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 103 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: BAI against ARTY, Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026; GDXJ against ACWI, Nov 20, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.
GDXJ returned more: +104.9% to +67.0%. BAI swung less: 34.4% to 49.7%. BAI fell less at its worst: −33.3% to −41.0%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BAI | GDXJ | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +67.0% | +104.9% | GDXJ | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +29.5% | +43.6% | GDXJ | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +64.0% | +95.4% | GDXJ | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 34.4% | 49.7% | BAI | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 23.4% | 31.5% | BAI | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −33.3% | −41.0% | BAI | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 91.9% | 72.0% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 102.9% | 97.3% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.98 | 0.99 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.89 | 0.14 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.81 | 0.89 | GDXJ (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.19 | 1.41 | GDXJ | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.283 | 0.095 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.89 | 1.06 | GDXJ | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | ARTY | ACWI | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | −9.4% a year | −0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | −1.15 | −0.01 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −25.5% to +6.8% | −19.0% to +18.9% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.88 | 0.00 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 11.3% | 39.5% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 103 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BAI and GDXJ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BAI | GDXJ | BAI | GDXJ |
| 3 months | +16.3% | +9.9% | −5.1 pts vs ARTY | +5.5 pts vs ACWI |
| 6 months | +5.1% | −8.0% | −17.8 pts vs ARTY | −15.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 1 year | +19.6% | +14.8% | −28.2 pts vs ARTY | +1.4 pts vs ACWI |
| 3 years | – | +220.2% | – | +131.3 pts vs ACWI |
| Since launchNot the same days: BAI Oct 2024 · GDXJ Nov 2009 | +77.2% | +44.9% | −33.5 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BAI and GDXJ are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Theme. BAI covers Artificial intelligence and GDXJ covers Gold miners.
- What each follows. BAI follows Artificial intelligence and GDXJ follows Gold miners.
- Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BAI
By weight, 55% of BAI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 76%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +47.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index, so a holder was behind by 28.2 pts. It sits 19.6% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
GDXJ
By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 33.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Do BAI and GDXJ hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAI against GDXJ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-gdxj
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BAI against GDXJ. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-gdxj
[BAI against GDXJ (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-gdxj)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.