Do GDXJ and PAVE hold the same stocks?

By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.

Which is more different from the S&P 500, GDXJ or PAVE?

GDXJ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PAVE has 62%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.

Which is cheaper, GDXJ or PAVE?

GDXJ charges 0.52% a year and PAVE charges 0.47%, so PAVE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

Thematic ETFs

GDXJ vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share on X Download as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GDXJ returned +14.8% to PAVE's +11.4%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GDXJ and PAVE

Net assets: $7.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF, and $13.6bn on Oct 12, 2026 for Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF.

GDXJ on its own →PAVE on its own →

At a glance

0.0%

GDXJ in the S&P 500

62.1%

PAVE in the S&P 500

+14.8%

GDXJ total return, 1 year

+11.4%

PAVE total return, 1 year

GDXJ · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 100% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

0% of GDXJ's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 100% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 22, 2026.

PAVE · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 38% of its weight is outside the S&P 500

62% of PAVE's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 38% is outside the index. Holdings as of May 31, 2026.

Pair scorecard

PAVE costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; PAVE is 1.6 times larger.

Points (pts) are percentage points.

GDXJ vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	GDXJ	PAVE
Return
Measure	GDXJ	PAVE
Total return, 1 year	+14.8%	+11.4%
Drawdown
Measure	GDXJ	PAVE
Below its all-time high	33.1%, high on Feb 27, 2026	10.9%, high on Jun 25, 2026
Against its benchmark
Measure	GDXJ	PAVE
What it tracks	Gold miners	Infrastructure
Its benchmark, total return, 1 year	+13.4%
Against its benchmark, 1 year	ahead by 1.4 pts
Cost and size
Measure	GDXJ	PAVE
Expense ratio	0.52%	0.47%
Net assets, as of Oct 12, 2026	$8.3bn	$13.6bn
Holdings
Measure	GDXJ	PAVE
Holdings in common	0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 17, 2017 to Oct 23, 2026 · 501 weekly returns

GDXJ PAVE

Return

Total return edge PAVE +203.6% +267.9%

Annualized edge PAVE +12.2% +14.5%

Price return edge PAVE +173.8% +246.3%

Risk

Volatility edge PAVE 41.5% 24.0%

Max drawdown edge PAVE −54.1% −42.2%

Risk-adjusted

Sharpe edge PAVE 0.43 0.58

Sortino edge PAVE 0.63 0.84

Calmar edge PAVE 0.23 0.34

Reading

PAVE returned more: +267.9% to +203.6%. PAVE swung less: 24.0% to 41.5%. PAVE fell less at its worst: −42.2% to −54.1%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓

Risk and return: GDXJ vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Measure	GDXJ	PAVE	Edge	How it is measured
Return
Total return	+203.6%	+267.9%	PAVE	Price change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized	+12.2%	+14.5%	PAVE	Total return as a yearly rate.
Price return	+173.8%	+246.3%	PAVE	Price change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility	41.5%	24.0%	PAVE	Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation	28.6%	16.5%	PAVE	Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown	−54.1%	−42.2%	PAVE	Deepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe	0.43	0.58	PAVE	Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino	0.63	0.84	PAVE	Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar	0.23	0.34	PAVE	Annualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 501 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

By the books each fund has filed, GDXJ and PAVE hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

50%

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GDXJ PAVE

Only in one fund ↓

Only in GDXJ

Alamos Gold Inc 6.86%

Equinox Gold Corp 6.08%

Coeur Mining Inc 5.92%

Endeavour Mining Plc 5.76%

Iamgold Corp 5.19%

Industrias Penoles Sab De Cv 2.58%

First Majestic Silver Corp 2.27%

Hecla Mining Co 2.26%

Only in PAVE

QUANTA SERVICES, INC. 4.18%

CSX Corporation 3.48%

EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 3.30%

HOWMET AEROSPACE INC. 3.27%

TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 3.19%

UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION 3.12%

NUCOR CORPORATION 3.10%

ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. 2.92%

Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: GDXJ vs PAVE: Holdings Overlap & Returns
	Total return		vs its benchmark
Window	GDXJ	PAVE	GDXJ	PAVE
3 months	+9.9%	−3.0%	+5.5 pts vs ACWI	not measured
6 months	−8.0%	−3.1%	−15.4 pts vs ACWI	not measured
1 year	+14.8%	+11.4%	+1.4 pts vs ACWI	not measured
3 years	+220.2%	+92.8%	+131.3 pts vs ACWI	not measured
Since launchNot the same days: GDXJ Nov 2009 · PAVE Mar 2017	+44.9%	+284.2%	not measured	not measured

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF · Holds 156 stocks in gold miners, 0% of its weight in S&P 500 companies PAVE Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF · Holds 100 stocks in infrastructure, 62% of its weight in S&P 500 companies

Issuer VanEck Global X

Theme Gold miners Infrastructure

In the S&P 500 0.0% 62.1%

Active share vs the S&P 500 100.0% 97.2%

In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 6.2%

Holdings 156 100

Top ten, share of the fund 40.8% 32.3%

Expense ratio 0.52% 0.47%

Fee for the differing part 0.52% 0.48%

Total return, 1 year +14.8% +11.4%

vs its benchmark +1.4 pts vs ACWI not measured

Below its high −33.1% −10.9%

Net assets, GDXJ as of Oct 27, 2026 and PAVE as of Oct 12, 2026 $7.6bn $13.6bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Alert

About each fund

GDXJ

By weight, 0% of GDXJ's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 41% of the fund across 156 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested against +13.4% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI Index, so a holder was ahead by 1.4 pts. It sits 33.1% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

PAVE

By weight, 62% of PAVE's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 97%. The top ten holdings are 32% of the fund across 100 positions, as filed for May 31, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +11.4% with distributions reinvested. It sits 10.9% below its all-time high of Jun 25, 2026.

Questions people ask

Do GDXJ and PAVE hold the same stocks?: By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, GDXJ or PAVE?: GDXJ has 0% of its weight in S&P 500 names and PAVE has 62%, so GDXJ differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, GDXJ or PAVE?: GDXJ charges 0.52% a year and PAVE charges 0.47%, so PAVE is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

GDXJ vs IFRA GDXJ vs IGF GDXJ vs IGV GDXJ vs ITA PAVE vs GDX PAVE vs ARKG PAVE vs PPA PAVE vs SHLD

Where to next

All thematic ETFs ranked by the S&P 500 Difference Score →How the scores are computed →GDXJ on its own →PAVE on its own →GDXJ dividend history →GDXJ holdings →PAVE dividend history →PAVE holdings →Method →Standards and sources →

Sources and dates

GDXJ filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

GDXJ prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

VanEck website ↗

PAVE filings on SEC EDGAR ↗

PAVE prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

Global X page for PAVE ↗

Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GDXJ against PAVE, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/gdxj-vs-pave

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.