Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BAI vs CIBR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BAI returned +19.6% to CIBR's +39.0%; 18% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BAI and CIBRNet assets: $13.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF, and $19.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF.
55% of BAI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.
61% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.
Pair scorecard
BAI costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 19.4 points; CIBR is 1.4 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BAI | CIBR |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +39.0% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 19.6%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Artificial intelligence | Cybersecurity |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +47.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 28.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.58% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $13.2bn | $19.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 18% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42% | 57% |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 112 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
A percentile among the 112 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 103 weekly returnsCIBR returned more: +77.5% to +67.0%. CIBR swung less: 26.3% to 34.4%. CIBR fell less at its worst: −21.2% to −33.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BAI | CIBR | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +67.0% | +77.5% | CIBR | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +29.5% | +33.6% | CIBR | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +64.0% | +76.1% | CIBR | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 34.4% | 26.3% | CIBR | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 23.4% | 16.2% | CIBR | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −33.3% | −21.2% | CIBR | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.81 | 1.08 | CIBR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.19 | 1.76 | CIBR | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.89 | 1.58 | CIBR | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 103 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BAI and CIBR hold 18% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
18% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BAI | CIBR | BAI | CIBR |
| 3 months | +16.3% | +21.5% | −5.1 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
| 6 months | +5.1% | +59.2% | −17.8 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
| 1 year | +19.6% | +39.0% | −28.2 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
| 3 years | – | +149.7% | – | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: BAI Oct 2024 · CIBR Jul 2015 | +77.2% | +472.8% | −33.5 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
18% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BAI and CIBR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Theme. BAI covers Artificial intelligence and CIBR covers Cybersecurity.
- Concentration. The top ten holdings are 42.5% of BAI and 57.4% of CIBR, a gap of 14.9 points.
- What each follows. BAI follows Artificial intelligence and CIBR follows Cybersecurity.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BAI
By weight, 55% of BAI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 76%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +47.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index, so a holder was behind by 28.2 pts. It sits 19.6% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
CIBR
By weight, 61% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +39.0% with distributions reinvested.
Questions people ask
- Do BAI and CIBR hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 18% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAI against CIBR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-cibr
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BAI against CIBR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-cibr
[BAI against CIBR (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-cibr)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.