Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
BAI vs IGV: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BAI returned +19.6% to IGV's −4.1%; 7% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about BAI and IGVNet assets: $13.6bn on Oct 28, 2026 for iShares A.I. Innovation and Tech Active ETF, and $14.4bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF.
55% of BAI's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 45% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.
80% of IGV's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 20% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.
Pair scorecard
IGV costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 23.7 points; IGV is 1.1 times larger.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | BAI | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | −4.1% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 19.6%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Artificial intelligence | Cloud and software |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +47.8% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 28.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.55% | 0.38% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 | $13.2bn | $14.4bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 7% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 42% | 61% |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 112 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
A percentile among the 112 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Nov 1, 2024 to Oct 23, 2026 · 103 weekly returnsBAI returned more: +67.0% to +19.9%. IGV swung slightly less: 31.7% to 34.4%. BAI fell slightly less at its worst: −33.3% to −36.3%.
Full scorecard
9 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | BAI | IGV | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +67.0% | +19.9% | BAI | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +29.5% | +9.6% | BAI | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +64.0% | +19.9% | BAI | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 34.4% | 31.7% | IGV (slight) | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 23.4% | 20.8% | IGV | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −33.3% | −36.3% | BAI (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.81 | 0.32 | BAI | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.19 | 0.48 | BAI | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Calmar | 0.89 | 0.26 | BAI | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 103 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, BAI and IGV hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.
half
7% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | BAI | IGV | BAI | IGV |
| 3 months | +16.3% | +21.2% | −5.1 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
| 6 months | +5.1% | +32.5% | −17.8 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
| 1 year | +19.6% | −4.1% | −28.2 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
| 3 years | – | +70.0% | – | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: BAI Oct 2024 · IGV Jul 2001 | +77.2% | +1,015.0% | −33.5 pts vs ARTY | not measured |
– means no data for this window. Open this comparison in the app →
Side by side
As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
7% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
BAI and IGV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Theme. BAI covers Artificial intelligence and IGV covers Cloud and software.
- Concentration. The top ten holdings are 42.5% of BAI and 60.7% of IGV, a gap of 18.2 points.
- What each follows. BAI follows Artificial intelligence and IGV follows Cloud and software.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
BAI
By weight, 55% of BAI's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 76%. The top ten holdings are 42% of the fund across 49 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested against +47.8% for its benchmark, the Morningstar Global Artificial Intelligence Select Index, so a holder was behind by 28.2 pts. It sits 19.6% below its all-time high of Jun 22, 2026.
IGV
By weight, 80% of IGV's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 92%. The top ten holdings are 61% of the fund across 108 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned −4.1% with distributions reinvested.
Questions people ask
- Do BAI and IGV hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, BAI against IGV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-igv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). BAI against IGV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-igv
[BAI against IGV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/bai-vs-igv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.