Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsOpen in the appCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Thematic ETFs

ARKG vs CIBR: Holdings Overlap & Returns

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, ARKG returned +80.0% to CIBR's +39.0%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about ARKG and CIBR

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $2.2bn for ARK Genomic Revolution ETF and $19.0bn for First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF.

At a glance
3.9%
ARKG in the S&P 500
60.8%
CIBR in the S&P 500
+80.0%
ARKG total return, 1 year
+39.0%
CIBR total return, 1 year
ARKG · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 96% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
96% of its weight is outside the S&P 5004% of ARKG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.4%96%inof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · top ten 58% of the fund · 35 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 0% in96% of its weight is outside the S&P 5004% of ARKG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.4%96%4% of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 99% · Nasdaq-100: 0% in

4% of ARKG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 96% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

CIBR · 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 39% of its weight is outside the S&P 500
39% of its weight is outside the S&P 50061% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.61%39%of its weight in S&P 500 companiesof its weight outside the S&P 500active share 91% · top ten 57% of the fund · 45 holdings as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026 · Nasdaq-100: 48% in39% of its weight is outside the S&P 50061% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.61%39%in the S&P 500outsideactive share 91% · Nasdaq-100: 48% in

61% of CIBR's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 39% is outside the index. Holdings as of Oct 27, 2026.

Pair scorecard

CIBR costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 41.0 points; CIBR is 8.6 times larger.

ARKG vs CIBR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureARKGCIBR
Return
Total return, 1 year+80.0%+39.0%
Drawdown
Below its all-time high50.9%, high on Jan 20, 2021
Benchmark
What it tracksGenomics and gene editingCybersecurity
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.75%0.58%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$2.2bn$19.0bn
Active share vs the S&P 50098%91%
Holdings
Holdings in common0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jul 17, 2015 to Oct 23, 2026 · 588 weekly returns
ARKG CIBR
Return
Total return edge CIBR +115.2% +450.4%
Annualized edge CIBR +7.0% +16.3%
Price return edge CIBR +101.3% +417.9%
Risk
Volatility edge CIBR 40.8% 23.7%
Max drawdown edge CIBR −82.9% −33.9%
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CIBR 0.31 0.66
Sortino edge CIBR 0.48 0.99
Calmar edge CIBR 0.08 0.48
Reading

CIBR returned more: +450.4% to +115.2%. CIBR swung less: 23.7% to 40.8%. CIBR fell less at its worst: −33.9% to −82.9%.

Full scorecard

9 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: ARKG vs CIBR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
MeasureARKGCIBREdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+115.2%+450.4%CIBRPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+7.0%+16.3%CIBRTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+101.3%+417.9%CIBRPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility40.8%23.7%CIBRSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation26.9%15.9%CIBRLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−82.9%−33.9%CIBRDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.310.66CIBRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.480.99CIBRReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Calmar0.080.48CIBRAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 588 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, ARKG and CIBR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first ARKG CIBR
Only in one fund ↓
Only in ARKG
10X GENOMICS INC-CLASS A 8.90%
TWIST BIOSCIENCE CORP 8.59%
TEMPUS AI INC-CL A 8.26%
CRISPR THERAPEUTICS AG 5.28%
ABSCI CORP 5.18%
GUARDANT HEALTH INC 5.00%
ILLUMINA INC 4.82%
NATERA INC 4.73%
Only in CIBR
CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. (Class A) 8.46%
Fortinet, Inc. 7.89%
Palo Alto Networks, Inc. 7.66%
Cisco Systems, Inc. 7.35%
Broadcom Inc. 6.74%
Okta, Inc. 4.49%
Zscaler, Inc. 4.41%
Cloudflare, Inc. (Class A) 3.92%
Check overlap with more funds →

Window by window

Window by window: ARKG vs CIBR: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Total return
WindowARKGCIBR
3 months+46.2%+21.5%
6 months+92.1%+59.2%
1 year+80.0%+39.0%
3 years+146.5%+149.7%
Since launchNot the same days: ARKG Oct 2014 · CIBR Jul 2015+191.5%+472.8%

Open this comparison in the app →

Side by side

ARKG ARK Genomic Revolution ETF · Holds 35 stocks in genomics and gene editing, 4% of its weight in S&P 500 companies CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF · Holds 45 stocks in cybersecurity, 61% of its weight in S&P 500 companies
Theme Genomics and gene editing Cybersecurity
In the S&P 500 3.9% 60.8%
Active share vs the S&P 500 98.5% 90.9%
In the Nasdaq-100 0.0% 48.3%
Holdings 35 45
Top ten, share of the fund 58.3% 57.4%
Expense ratio 0.75% 0.58%
Fee for the differing part 0.76% 0.64%
Total return, 1 year +80.0% +39.0%
vs its benchmark not measured not measured
Below its high −50.9% −1.9%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $2.2bn $19.0bn

As of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-1C581C1EAE

ARKG and CIBR are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. Theme. ARKG covers Genomics and gene editing and CIBR covers Cybersecurity.
  2. What each follows. ARKG follows Genomics and gene editing and CIBR follows Cybersecurity.
  3. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

CIBR flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
ARKG

By weight, 4% of ARKG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 98%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 35 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +80.0% with distributions reinvested. It sits 50.9% below its all-time high of Jan 20, 2021.

CIBR

By weight, 61% of CIBR's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 91%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 45 positions, as published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 the fund returned +39.0% with distributions reinvested.

Questions people ask

Do ARKG and CIBR hold the same stocks?
By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Which is more different from the S&P 500, ARKG or CIBR?
ARKG has 4% of its weight in S&P 500 names and CIBR has 61%, so ARKG differs more from the index.
Which is cheaper, ARKG or CIBR?
ARKG charges 0.75% a year and CIBR charges 0.58%, so CIBR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ARKG against CIBR, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/arkg-vs-cibr

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.