Data as of Nov 4, 2026.
AOTG vs GDOC: Holdings Overlap & Returns
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026, AOTG returned +3.2% to GDOC's +15.5%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about AOTG and GDOCNet assets: $105m on Aug 31, 2026 for AOT Growth and Innovation ETF, and $20m on Nov 3, 2026 for Goldman Sachs Future Health Care Equity ETF.
74% of AOTG's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 26% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
63% of GDOC's weight is in S&P 500 companies and 38% is outside the index. Holdings as of Aug 31, 2026.
Pair scorecard
Both cost 0.75% a year; their one-year returns differ by 12.3 points.
Points (pts) are percentage points.
| Measure | AOTG | GDOC |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +3.2% | +15.5% |
| Drawdown | ||
| Below its all-time high | 14.7%, high on Oct 7, 2026 | |
| Against its benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Broad innovation and megatrends | Broad innovation and megatrends |
| Its benchmark, total return, 1 year | +14.4% | |
| Against its benchmark, 1 year | behind by 11.2 pts | |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.75% |
| Net assets, AOTG as of Aug 31, 2026 and GDOC as of Nov 3, 2026 | $105m | $20m |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 0% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 64% | 57% |
How different its holdings are from the S&P 500, ranked against 114 thematic ETFs with at least half their money in S&P 500 companies. 100 is best. How it is computed
Weight not shared with the S&P 500 only; it says nothing about returns, fees or whether the theme pays off. All thematic ETFs ranked by it →
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, AOTG and GDOC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
0% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Window by window
| Total return | vs its benchmark | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | AOTG | GDOC | AOTG | GDOC |
| 3 months | −7.6% | +9.2% | −7.1 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
| 6 months | −1.1% | +23.1% | −5.8 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
| 1 year | +3.2% | +15.5% | −11.2 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
| 3 years | +101.5% | +37.3% | +19.6 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
| Since launchNot the same days: AOTG Jun 2022 · GDOC Nov 2021 | +139.7% | +2.6% | +29.2 pts vs GUSA | not measured |
Side by side
As of Nov 4, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
0% of the two portfolios are the same securities at the same weight.
Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +3.2% with distributions reinvested against +14.4% for its benchmark, the Solactive GBS United States 1000 Index, so a holder was behind by 11.2 pts.
By weight, 74% of AOTG's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 69%. The top ten holdings are 64% of the fund across 43 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. It sits 14.7% below its all-time high of Oct 7, 2026.
GDOC
By weight, 62% of GDOC's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 95%. The top ten holdings are 57% of the fund across 39 positions, as filed for Aug 31, 2026. Over the year to Nov 4, 2026 the fund returned +15.5% with distributions reinvested.
Questions people ask
- Do AOTG and GDOC hold the same stocks?
- By their latest filings, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight. Overlap is the sum of the smaller weight of every security they share.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a place in a set, not a rating or a recommendation.
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Every number is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, AOTG against GDOC, data as of Nov 4, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-gdoc
ETFIQ. (Nov 4, 2026). AOTG against GDOC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-gdoc
[AOTG against GDOC (ETFIQ, Nov 4, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/themes/aotg-vs-gdoc)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.