TSL vs TSLS: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TSL finished 0.7 points short and TSLS 2.1 points over. GraniteShares 1.25x Long TSLA Daily ETF and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF.

−21.9%
TSL returned, 3 months
+14.0%
TSLS returned, 3 months
−1.2 pts
TSL from its stated multiple
−2.6 pts
TSLS from its stated multiple
TSL · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.2 pts short of its stated multiple
1.2 pts short of its stated multipleTSL returned −21.9% while 1.25 times TSLA's move would have been −20.7%TSLA −16.6% ×1.25 implies−20.7%TSL returned−21.9%1.2 pts short of its stated multipleTSL returned −21.9% while 1.25 times TSLA's move would have been −20.7%TSLA −16.6% ×1.25 implies−20.7%TSL returned−21.9%

TSL returned −21.9% while 1.25 times TSLA's move would have been −20.7%

TSLS · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.6 pts short of its stated multiple
2.6 pts short of its stated multipleTSLS returned +14.0% while −1 times TSLA's move would have been +16.6%TSLA −16.6% ×−1 implies+16.6%TSLS returned+14.0%2.6 pts short of its stated multipleTSLS returned +14.0% while −1 times TSLA's move would have been +16.6%TSLA −16.6% ×−1 implies+16.6%TSLS returned+14.0%

TSLS returned +14.0% while −1 times TSLA's move would have been +16.6%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · TSL scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSL among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

TSL 97.6
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

TSLS among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

TSLS 66.8
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. TSLS is a percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowTSLTSLSTSLTSLSTSLTSLS
1 month−5.0%+2.8%−4.5%+3.6%−0.5 pts−0.7 pts
3 months−21.9%+14.0%−20.7%+16.6%−1.2 pts−2.6 pts
6 months−11.9%−1.3%−8.7%+6.9%−3.2 pts−8.3 pts
1 year−29.5%+9.5%−25.3%+20.2%−4.3 pts−10.7 pts
3 years+14.7%−67.6%+52.3%−41.8%−37.6 pts−25.8 pts
Since launch
TSL Aug 2022 · TSLS Aug 2022
−14.9%−73.5%+31.5%−25.2%−46.4 pts−48.3 pts

TSL and TSLS over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

TSL
GraniteShares 1.25x Long TSLA Daily ETF · Aims to return 1.25 times the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
Issuer GraniteShares Direxion
Sets out to return +1.25x -1x
Underlying asset TSLA TSLA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −21.9% +14.0%
Underlying returned, over that window −16.6% −16.6%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −20.7% +16.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −1.2 pts −2.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −29.5% +9.5%
Difference from stated, over that window −4.3 pts −10.7 pts
Underlying volatility 52% 52%
Expense ratio 1.15% 0.95%
Launched Aug 9, 2022 Aug 9, 2022
Net assets $11m $59m

TSL and TSLS on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

TSL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: TSL returned −21.9% where its own daily promise gave −21.2%, 0.7 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 1.25 times TSLA's −16.6% implies −20.7%, which makes TSL look 1.2 points short. 0.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 1.25 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSL aims to return +1.25 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +1.25 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 52% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLS in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: TSLS returned +14.0% where its own daily promise gave +11.9%, 2.1 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times TSLA's −16.6% implies +16.6%, which makes TSLS look 2.6 points short. 4.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. TSLS aims to return -1 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSL or TSLS?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, TSL finished 1.2 points from what its multiple implies and TSLS finished 2.6 points from its own, so TSL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSL and TSLS levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSL at +1.25 times and TSLS at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSL or TSLS?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSL’s moved at 52% annualized and TSLS’s at 52%, so TSL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSL or TSLS for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSL or TSLS?
TSL charges 1.15% a year and TSLS charges 0.95%, so TSLS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, TSL against TSLS, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tsl-vs-tsls

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.