TSLI vs TSLS: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TSLI finished 2.5 points short and TSLS 1.9 points over. ProShares Ultra TSLA and Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF.

Both cost 0.95% a year; their one-year returns differ by 45.6 points; TSLS is 13.3 times larger.

TSLITSLS
Expense ratio0.95%0.95%
Net assets, TSLI as of Oct 9, 2026 and TSLS as of Oct 8, 2026$3m$47m
Total return, 1 year−45.4%+0.2%
What it tracksTSLATSLA
Holdings in commonnot published
What its daily multiple gave, 3 months−17.6%+0.4%
−20.1%
TSLI returned, 3 months
+2.4%
TSLS returned, 3 months
−7.8 pts
TSLI from its stated multiple: compounding −5.3 pts, the fund −2.5 pts
−3.8 pts
TSLS from its stated multiple: compounding −5.7 pts, the fund +1.9 pts
TSLI · 3 months to Oct 9, 20267.8 pts short of its stated multiple
7.8 pts short of its stated multipleTSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%TSLI returned−20.1%7.8 pts short of its stated multipleTSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%TSLI returned−20.1%

TSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

TSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

TSLS · 3 months to Oct 9, 20263.8 pts short of its stated multiple
3.8 pts short of its stated multipleTSLS returned +2.4% while −1 times TSLA's move would have been +6.2%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×−1 implies+6.2%TSLS returned+2.4%3.8 pts short of its stated multipleTSLS returned +2.4% while −1 times TSLA's move would have been +6.2%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×−1 implies+6.2%TSLS returned+2.4%

TSLS returned +2.4% while −1 times TSLA's move would have been +6.2%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

TSLS returned +2.4% while −1 times TSLA's move would have been +6.2%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · TSLS scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSLI among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

TSLI 58.3
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

TSLS among the 128 inverse ETFs over three months

TSLS 65.2
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. TSLS is a percentile among the 128 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowTSLITSLSTSLITSLSTSLITSLS
1 month+6.1%−4.0%+8.1%−4.0%−2.0 pts+0.1 pts
3 months−20.1%+2.4%−12.3%+6.2%−7.8 pts−3.8 pts
6 months−0.8%−16.2%+19.3%−9.7%−20.2 pts−6.5 pts
1 year−45.4%+0.2%−24.3%+12.1%−21.1 pts−11.9 pts
3 yearsnot published−68.3%not published−45.2%not published−23.1 pts
Since launch
TSLI Sep 2025 · TSLS Aug 2022
−17.7%−75.4%+20.1%−35.1%−37.8 pts−40.4 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

TSLI
ProShares Ultra TSLA · Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLS
Direxion Daily TSLA Bear 1X ETF · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
Sets out to return +2x -1x
Underlying asset TSLA TSLA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −20.1% +2.4%
Underlying returned, over that window −6.2% −6.2%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −12.3% +6.2%
Difference from stated, over that window −7.8 pts −3.8 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −45.4% +0.2%
Difference from stated, over that window −21.1 pts −11.9 pts
Underlying volatility 48% 48%
Difference over the days both have traded −7.8 pts no shared window
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
First traded Sep 10, 2025 Aug 9, 2022
Net assets, TSLI as of Oct 9, 2026 and TSLS as of Oct 8, 2026 $3m $47m

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

TSLI in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: TSLI returned −20.1% where its own daily promise gave −17.6%, 2.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TSLA's −6.2% implies −12.3%, which makes TSLI look 7.8 points short. That 7.8 is two pieces: daily compounding, −5.3 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −2.5 points against its own daily promise. TSLI aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 48% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLS in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: TSLS returned +2.4% where its own daily promise gave +0.4%, 1.9 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times TSLA's −6.2% implies +6.2%, which makes TSLS look 3.8 points short. That 3.8 is two pieces: daily compounding, −5.7 points, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, +1.9 points against its own daily promise. TSLS aims to return -1 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLI or TSLS?
Over the window to Oct 9, 2026, TSLI finished 7.8 points from what its multiple implies and TSLS finished 3.8 points from its own, so TSLS came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSLI and TSLS levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLI at +2 times and TSLS at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSLI or TSLS?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLI’s moved at 48% annualized and TSLS’s at 48%, so TSLI has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSLI or TSLS for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSLI or TSLS?
TSLI and TSLS both charge 0.95% a year, so neither is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, TSLI against TSLS, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tsli-vs-tsls

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.