TSLI vs TSLL: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, TSLI finished 7.8 points from its stated multiple and TSLL 7.7. ProShares Ultra TSLA and Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF.

TSLL costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; TSLL is far larger, $3.9bn against $3m.

TSLITSLL
Expense ratio0.95%0.83%
Net assets, TSLI as of Oct 9, 2026 and TSLL as of Oct 8, 2026$3m$3.9bn
Total return, 1 year−45.4%−45.0%
What it tracksTSLATSLA
Holdings in commonnot published
What its daily multiple gave, 3 months−17.6%−17.6%
Against its daily multiple, 3 months2.5 points short2.4 points short
−20.1%
TSLI returned, 3 months
−20.0%
TSLL returned, 3 months
−7.8 pts
TSLI from its stated multiple: compounding −5.3 pts, the fund −2.5 pts
−7.7 pts
TSLL from its stated multiple: compounding −5.3 pts, the fund −2.4 pts
TSLI · 3 months to Oct 9, 20267.8 pts short of its stated multiple
7.8 pts short of its stated multipleTSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%TSLI returned−20.1%7.8 pts short of its stated multipleTSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%TSLI returned−20.1%

TSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

TSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

TSLL · 3 months to Oct 9, 20267.7 pts short of its stated multiple
7.7 pts short of its stated multipleTSLL returned −20.0% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%TSLL returned−20.0%7.7 pts short of its stated multipleTSLL returned −20.0% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%TSLL returned−20.0%

TSLL returned −20.0% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · TSLL scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowTSLITSLLTSLITSLLTSLITSLL
1 month+6.1%+6.3%+8.1%+8.1%−2.0 pts−1.8 pts
3 months−20.1%−20.0%−12.3%−12.3%−7.8 pts−7.7 pts
6 months−0.8%−0.4%+19.3%+19.3%−20.2 pts−19.8 pts
1 year−45.4%−45.0%−24.3%−24.3%−21.1 pts−20.7 pts
3 yearsnot published−27.9%not published+90.3%not published−118.3 pts
Since launch
TSLI Sep 2025 · TSLL Aug 2022
−17.7%−49.0%+20.1%+70.1%−37.8 pts−119.1 pts

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

TSLI
ProShares Ultra TSLA · Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLL
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
Sets out to return +2x +2x
Underlying asset TSLA TSLA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −20.1% −20.0%
Underlying returned, over that window −6.2% −6.2%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −12.3% −12.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −7.8 pts −7.7 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −45.4% −45.0%
Difference from stated, over that window −21.1 pts −20.7 pts
Underlying volatility 48% 48%
Difference over the days both have traded −7.8 pts −7.7 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.83%
First traded Sep 10, 2025 Aug 9, 2022
Net assets, TSLI as of Oct 9, 2026 and TSLL as of Oct 8, 2026 $3m $3.9bn

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

TSLI in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: TSLI returned −20.1% where its own daily promise gave −17.6%, 2.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TSLA's −6.2% implies −12.3%, which makes TSLI look 7.8 points short. That 7.8 is two pieces: daily compounding, −5.3 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −2.5 points against its own daily promise. TSLI aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 48% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLL in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: TSLL returned −20.0% where its own daily promise gave −17.6%, 2.4 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TSLA's −6.2% implies −12.3%, which makes TSLL look 7.7 points short. That 7.7 is two pieces: daily compounding, −5.3 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −2.4 points against its own daily promise. TSLL aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLI or TSLL?
Over the window to Oct 9, 2026, TSLI finished 7.8 points from what its multiple implies and TSLL finished 7.7 points from its own, so TSLL came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSLI and TSLL levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLI at +2 times and TSLL at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSLI or TSLL?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLI’s moved at 48% annualized and TSLL’s at 48%, so TSLI has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSLI or TSLL for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSLI or TSLL?
TSLI charges 0.95% a year and TSLL charges 0.83%, so TSLL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, TSLI against TSLL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tsli-vs-tsll

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.