TESC vs TSLI: which held to its multiple?
Over the days both have traded, TESC finished 7.4 points from its stated multiple and TSLI 7.8. Corgi TSLA 2x Daily ETF and ProShares Ultra TSLA.
TESC costs 0.50 points a year less; TSLI is 10.1 times larger.
| TESC | TSLI | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.95% |
| Net assets | $346,280 | $3m |
| Total return, 1 year | not published | −45.4% |
| What it tracks | TSLA | TSLA |
| Holdings in common | not published | |
| What its daily multiple gave, 3 months | −17.6% | −17.6% |
| Against its daily multiple, 3 months | 2.1 points short | 2.5 points short |
TESC returned −19.7% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.
TESC returned −19.7% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.
TSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.
Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.
A percentile among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | TESC | TSLI | TESC | TSLI | TESC | TSLI |
| 1 month | +6.6% | +6.1% | +8.1% | +8.1% | −1.5 pts | −2.0 pts |
| 3 months | −19.7% | −20.1% | −12.3% | −12.3% | −7.4 pts | −7.8 pts |
| 6 months | not published | −0.8% | not published | +19.3% | not published | −20.2 pts |
| 1 year | not published | −45.4% | not published | −24.3% | not published | −21.1 pts |
| Since launch TESC Jun 2026 · TSLI Sep 2025 | −26.0% | −17.7% | −18.0% | +20.1% | −8.0 pts | −37.8 pts |
Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
TESC in plain words
Three months to Oct 9, 2026: TESC returned −19.7% where its own daily promise gave −17.6%, 2.1 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TSLA's −6.2% implies −12.3%, which makes TESC look 7.4 points short. That 7.4 is two pieces: daily compounding, −5.3 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −2.1 points against its own daily promise. TESC aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 48% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
TSLI in plain words
Three months to Oct 9, 2026: TSLI returned −20.1% where its own daily promise gave −17.6%, 2.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TSLA's −6.2% implies −12.3%, which makes TSLI look 7.8 points short. That 7.8 is two pieces: daily compounding, −5.3 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −2.5 points against its own daily promise. TSLI aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, TESC or TSLI?
- Over the window to Oct 9, 2026, TESC finished 7.4 points from what its multiple implies and TSLI finished 7.8 points from its own, so TESC came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are TESC and TSLI levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TESC at +2 times and TSLI at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, TESC or TSLI?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TESC’s moved at 48% annualized and TSLI’s at 48%, so TESC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold TESC or TSLI for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.
Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.
ETFIQ, TESC against TSLI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tesc-vs-tsli
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). TESC against TSLI. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tesc-vs-tsli
[TESC against TSLI (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tesc-vs-tsli)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.