TSLI vs TSLQ: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, TSLI finished 2.5 points short and TSLQ 1.8 points over. ProShares Ultra TSLA and Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF.

TSLI costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 21.1 points; TSLQ is far larger, $97m against $3m.

TSLITSLQ
Expense ratio0.95%1.15%
Net assets$3m$97m
Total return, 1 year−45.4%−24.3%
What it tracksTSLATSLA
Holdings in commonnot published
What its daily multiple gave, 3 months−17.6%−4.5%
−20.1%
TSLI returned, 3 months
−2.7%
TSLQ returned, 3 months
−7.8 pts
TSLI from its stated multiple: compounding −5.3 pts, the fund −2.5 pts
−15.0 pts
TSLQ from its stated multiple: compounding −16.8 pts, the fund +1.8 pts
TSLI · 3 months to Oct 9, 20267.8 pts short of its stated multiple
7.8 pts short of its stated multipleTSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%TSLI returned−20.1%7.8 pts short of its stated multipleTSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×2 implies−12.3%TSLI returned−20.1%

TSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

TSLI returned −20.1% while 2 times TSLA's move would have been −12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

TSLQ · 3 months to Oct 9, 202615 pts short of its stated multiple
15 pts short of its stated multipleTSLQ returned −2.7% while −2 times TSLA's move would have been +12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×−2 implies+12.3%TSLQ returned−2.7%15 pts short of its stated multipleTSLQ returned −2.7% while −2 times TSLA's move would have been +12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.TSLA −6.2% ×−2 implies+12.3%TSLQ returned−2.7%

TSLQ returned −2.7% while −2 times TSLA's move would have been +12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

TSLQ returned −2.7% while −2 times TSLA's move would have been +12.3%. Figures from Jul 10, 2026 to Oct 9, 2026.

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · TSLQ scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

TSLI among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

TSLI 58.3
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

TSLQ among the 128 inverse ETFs over three months

TSLQ 61.3
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 517 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. TSLQ is a percentile among the 128 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowTSLITSLQTSLITSLQTSLITSLQ
1 month+6.1%−9.1%+8.1%−8.1%−2.0 pts−1.0 pts
3 months−20.1%−2.7%−12.3%+12.3%−7.8 pts−15.0 pts
6 months−0.8%−40.1%+19.3%−19.3%−20.2 pts−20.8 pts
1 year−45.4%−24.3%−24.3%+24.3%−21.1 pts−48.6 pts
3 yearsnot published−96.0%not published−90.3%not published−5.6 pts
Since launch
TSLI Sep 2025 · TSLQ Jul 2022
−17.7%−97.5%+20.1%not meaningful−37.8 ptsnot meaningful

Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

TSLI
ProShares Ultra TSLA · Aims to return twice the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
TSLQ
Tradr 2X Short TSLA Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Tesla (TSLA)
Sets out to return +2x -2x
Underlying asset TSLA TSLA
Segment company company
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −20.1% −2.7%
Underlying returned, over that window −6.2% −6.2%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −12.3% +12.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −7.8 pts −15.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −45.4% −24.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −21.1 pts −48.6 pts
Underlying volatility 48% 48%
Difference over the days both have traded −7.8 pts −15.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 1.15%
First traded Sep 10, 2025 Jul 14, 2022
Net assets $3m $97m

As of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

TSLI in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: TSLI returned −20.1% where its own daily promise gave −17.6%, 2.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times TSLA's −6.2% implies −12.3%, which makes TSLI look 7.8 points short. That 7.8 is two pieces: daily compounding, −5.3 points, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, −2.5 points against its own daily promise. TSLI aims to return +2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. TSLA moved at 48% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

TSLQ in plain words

Three months to Oct 9, 2026: TSLQ returned −2.7% where its own daily promise gave −4.5%, 1.8 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times TSLA's −6.2% implies +12.3%, which makes TSLQ look 15.0 points short. That 15.0 is two pieces: daily compounding, −16.8 points, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the fund itself, +1.8 points against its own daily promise. TSLQ aims to return -2 times TSLA's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, TSLI or TSLQ?
Over the window to Oct 9, 2026, TSLI finished 7.8 points from what its multiple implies and TSLQ finished 15.0 points from its own, so TSLI came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are TSLI and TSLQ levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on Tesla, TSLI at +2 times and TSLQ at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, TSLI or TSLQ?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window TSLI’s moved at 48% annualized and TSLQ’s at 48%, so TSLI has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold TSLI or TSLQ for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, TSLI or TSLQ?
TSLI charges 0.95% a year and TSLQ charges 1.15%, so TSLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation.

Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, TSLI against TSLQ, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/tsli-vs-tslq

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.