SPCM vs SSPC: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, SPCM finished 1.9 points short and SSPC 0.2 points short. Tradr 2X Long SpaceX Daily ETF and Leverage Shares 2X Short SPCX Daily ETF.
SPCM returned −20.5% while 2 times SPCX's move would have been −8.5%
SSPC returned −25.4% while −2 times SPCX's move would have been +8.5%
SPCM among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months
SSPC among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months
A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. SSPC is a percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | SPCM | SSPC | SPCM | SSPC | SPCM | SSPC |
| 1 month | +8.0% | −13.9% | +10.0% | −10.0% | −2.0 pts | −3.9 pts |
| 3 months | −20.5% | −25.4% | −8.5% | +8.5% | −12.1 pts | −33.9 pts |
| Since launch SPCM Jun 2026 · SSPC Jun 2026 | −50.0% | −3.6% | −43.3% | +43.3% | −6.7 pts | −46.9 pts |
SPCM and SSPC over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
SPCM and SSPC on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
SPCM in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPCM returned −20.5% where its own daily promise gave −18.6%, 1.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies −8.5%, which makes SPCM look 12.1 points short. 10.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCM aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 70% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
SSPC in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SSPC returned −25.4% where its own daily promise gave −25.1%, 0.2 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies +8.5%, which makes SSPC look 33.9 points short. 33.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SSPC aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, SPCM or SSPC?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SPCM finished 12.1 points from what its multiple implies and SSPC finished 33.9 points from its own, so SPCM came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are SPCM and SSPC levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SPCM at +2 times and SSPC at -2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, SPCM or SSPC?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SPCM’s moved at 70% annualized and SSPC’s at 70%, so SPCM has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold SPCM or SSPC for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, SPCM against SSPC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/spcm-vs-sspc
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, SPCM against SSPC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/spcm-vs-sspc Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, SPCM against SSPC, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/spcm-vs-sspc
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). SPCM against SSPC. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/spcm-vs-sspc
- Markdown
- [SPCM against SSPC (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/spcm-vs-sspc)