Which came closer to its stated multiple, SPCF or SPCM?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SPCF finished 14.1 points from what its multiple implies and SPCM finished 12.1 points from its own, so SPCM came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are SPCF and SPCM levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SPCF at +2 times and SPCM at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, SPCF or SPCM?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SPCF’s moved at 70% annualized and SPCM’s at 70%, so SPCF has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold SPCF or SPCM for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Which is cheaper, SPCF or SPCM?

SPCF charges 0.95% a year and SPCM charges 1.49%, so SPCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

SPCF vs SPCM: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, SPCF finished 14.1 points from its stated multiple and SPCM 12.1. ProShares Ultra SpaceX and Tradr 2X Long SpaceX Daily ETF.

−22.6%

SPCF returned, 3 months

−20.5%

SPCM returned, 3 months

−14.1 pts

SPCF from its stated multiple

−12.1 pts

SPCM from its stated multiple

SPCF · 3 months to Sep 30, 202614.1 pts short of its stated multiple

SPCF returned −22.6% while 2 times SPCX's move would have been −8.5%

SPCM · 3 months to Sep 30, 202612.1 pts short of its stated multiple

SPCM returned −20.5% while 2 times SPCX's move would have been −8.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SPCM scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

SPCF 24.7

SPCM 72.6

0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	SPCF	SPCM	SPCF	SPCM	SPCF	SPCM
1 month	+7.1%	+8.0%	+10.0%	+10.0%	−2.9 pts	−2.0 pts
3 months	−22.6%	−20.5%	−8.5%	−8.5%	−14.1 pts	−12.1 pts
Since launch SPCF Jun 2026 · SPCM Jun 2026	−51.7%	−50.0%	−43.3%	−43.3%	−8.5 pts	−6.7 pts

SPCF and SPCM over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SPCF

ProShares Ultra SpaceX · Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)

SPCM

Tradr 2X Long SpaceX Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)

Issuer ProShares Tradr

Sets out to return +2x +2x

Underlying asset SPCX SPCX

Segment company company

Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −22.6% −20.5%

Underlying returned, over that window −4.2% −4.2%

What the stated multiple implies, over that window −8.5% −8.5%

Difference from stated, over that window −14.1 pts −12.1 pts

Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −51.7% −50.0%

Difference from stated, over that window −8.5 pts −6.7 pts

Underlying volatility 70% 70%

Difference over the days both have traded −14.1 pts −12.1 pts

Expense ratio 0.95% 1.49%

Launched Jun 15, 2026 Jun 15, 2026

Net assets $94m $20m

SPCF and SPCM on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SPCF in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPCF returned −22.6% where its own daily promise gave −18.6%, 4.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies −8.5%, which makes SPCF look 14.1 points short. 10.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCF aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 70% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPCM in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPCM returned −20.5% where its own daily promise gave −18.6%, 1.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies −8.5%, which makes SPCM look 12.1 points short. SPCM aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SPCF or SPCM?: Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SPCF finished 14.1 points from what its multiple implies and SPCM finished 12.1 points from its own, so SPCM came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SPCF and SPCM levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SPCF at +2 times and SPCM at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SPCF or SPCM?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SPCF’s moved at 70% annualized and SPCM’s at 70%, so SPCF has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SPCF or SPCM for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SPCF or SPCM?: SPCF charges 0.95% a year and SPCM charges 1.49%, so SPCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

SPCF vs SPCH SPCF vs LOFF SPCF vs SNK SPCF vs SPCG SPCM vs LOFF SPCM vs SPCQ SPCM vs SPCU SPCM vs SSPC

SPCF on its own →SPCM on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

SPCF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SPCF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for SPCF ↗SPCM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SPCM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Tradr website ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, SPCF against SPCM, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/spcf-vs-spcm

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.