Which came closer to its stated multiple, SNK or SPCF?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SNK finished 34.2 points from what its multiple implies and SPCF finished 14.1 points from its own, so SPCF came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are SNK and SPCF levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SNK at -2 times and SPCF at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, SNK or SPCF?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SNK’s moved at 70% annualized and SPCF’s at 70%, so SNK has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold SNK or SPCF for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Which is cheaper, SNK or SPCF?

SNK charges 2.20% a year and SPCF charges 0.95%, so SPCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

SNK vs SPCF: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SNK finished 0.5 points short and SPCF 4.0 points short. GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF and ProShares Ultra SpaceX.

−25.7%

SNK returned, 3 months

−22.6%

SPCF returned, 3 months

−34.2 pts

SNK from its stated multiple

−14.1 pts

SPCF from its stated multiple

SNK · 3 months to Sep 30, 202634.2 pts short of its stated multiple

SNK returned −25.7% while −2 times SPCX's move would have been +8.5%

SPCF · 3 months to Sep 30, 202614.1 pts short of its stated multiple

SPCF returned −22.6% while 2 times SPCX's move would have been −8.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SPCF scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

SNK among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

SNK 11.6

0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

SPCF among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

SPCF 24.7

0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. SPCF is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	SNK	SPCF	SNK	SPCF	SNK	SPCF
1 month	−14.2%	+7.1%	−10.0%	+10.0%	−4.2 pts	−2.9 pts
3 months	−25.7%	−22.6%	+8.5%	−8.5%	−34.2 pts	−14.1 pts
Since launch SNK Jun 2026 · SPCF Jun 2026	−4.9%	−51.7%	+43.3%	−43.3%	−48.2 pts	−8.5 pts

SNK and SPCF over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SNK

GraniteShares 2x Short SpaceX Daily ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)

SPCF

ProShares Ultra SpaceX · Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)

Issuer GraniteShares ProShares

Sets out to return -2x +2x

Underlying asset SPCX SPCX

Segment company company

Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −25.7% −22.6%

Underlying returned, over that window −4.2% −4.2%

What the stated multiple implies, over that window +8.5% −8.5%

Difference from stated, over that window −34.2 pts −14.1 pts

Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −4.9% −51.7%

Difference from stated, over that window −48.2 pts −8.5 pts

Underlying volatility 70% 70%

Difference over the days both have traded −4.2 pts −14.1 pts

Expense ratio 2.20% 0.95%

Launched Jun 15, 2026 Jun 15, 2026

Net assets $60m $94m

SNK and SPCF on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SNK in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SNK returned −25.7% where its own daily promise gave −25.1%, 0.5 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies +8.5%, which makes SNK look 34.2 points short. 33.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SNK aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 70% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPCF in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPCF returned −22.6% where its own daily promise gave −18.6%, 4.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies −8.5%, which makes SPCF look 14.1 points short. 10.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCF aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SNK or SPCF?: Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SNK finished 34.2 points from what its multiple implies and SPCF finished 14.1 points from its own, so SPCF came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SNK and SPCF levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, SNK at -2 times and SPCF at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SNK or SPCF?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SNK’s moved at 70% annualized and SPCF’s at 70%, so SNK has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SNK or SPCF for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SNK or SPCF?: SNK charges 2.20% a year and SPCF charges 0.95%, so SPCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

SNK vs SPAL SNK vs SPAX SNK vs SSPC SNK vs SPCG SPCF vs SPCG SPCF vs SPCH SPCF vs SPCM SPCF vs SPCQ

SNK on its own →SPCF on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

SNK filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SNK prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗GraniteShares page for SNK ↗SPCF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SPCF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for SPCF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, SNK against SPCF, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/snk-vs-spcf

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.