SH vs SPDN: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, SH finished 1.5 points from its stated multiple and SPDN 1.4. ProShares Short S&P500 and Direxion Daily S&P 500 (R) Bear 1X ETF.

−1.1%
SH returned, 3 months
−1.1%
SPDN returned, 3 months
+1.5 pts
SH from its stated multiple
+1.4 pts
SPDN from its stated multiple
SH · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.5 pts ahead of its stated multiple
1.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleSH returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%SPY +2.5% ×−1 implies−2.5%SH returned−1.1%1.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleSH returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%SPY +2.5% ×−1 implies−2.5%SH returned−1.1%

SH returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%

SPDN · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.4 pts ahead of its stated multiple
1.4 pts ahead of its stated multipleSPDN returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%SPY +2.5% ×−1 implies−2.5%SPDN returned−1.1%1.4 pts ahead of its stated multipleSPDN returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%SPY +2.5% ×−1 implies−2.5%SPDN returned−1.1%

SPDN returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SH scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSHSPDNSHSPDNSHSPDN
1 month+0.8%+0.8%+0.3%+0.3%+0.4 pts+0.5 pts
3 months−1.1%−1.1%−2.5%−2.5%+1.5 pts+1.4 pts
6 months−12.3%−12.1%−17.0%−17.0%+4.7 pts+4.9 pts
1 year−9.1%−8.6%−15.7%−15.7%+6.7 pts+7.1 pts
3 years−35.5%−34.9%−85.0%−85.0%+49.5 pts+50.1 pts
Since launch
SH Jan 2010 · SPDN Jun 2016
−90.3%−73.7%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

SH and SPDN over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SH
ProShares Short S&P500 · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
SPDN
Direxion Daily S&P 500 (R) Bear 1X ETF · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
Issuer ProShares Direxion
Sets out to return -1x -1x
Underlying asset SPY SPY
Segment us large cap us large cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −1.1% −1.1%
Underlying returned, over that window +2.5% +2.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −2.5% −2.5%
Difference from stated, over that window +1.5 pts +1.4 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −9.1% −8.6%
Difference from stated, over that window +6.7 pts +7.1 pts
Underlying volatility 11% 11%
Difference over the days both have traded +1.5 pts +1.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.88% 0.48%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jun 8, 2016
Net assets $1.0bn $269m

SH and SPDN on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SH in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SH returned −1.1% where its own daily promise gave −2.8%, 1.7 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times SPY's 2.5% implies −2.5%, which makes SH look 1.5 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SH aims to return -1 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPY moved at 11% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPDN in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPDN returned −1.1% where its own daily promise gave −2.8%, 1.7 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times SPY's 2.5% implies −2.5%, which makes SPDN look 1.4 points over. SPDN aims to return -1 times SPY's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SH or SPDN?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SH finished 1.5 points from what its multiple implies and SPDN finished 1.4 points from its own, so SPDN came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SH and SPDN levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P 500, SH at -1 times and SPDN at -1 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SH or SPDN?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SH’s moved at 11% annualized and SPDN’s at 11%, so SH has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SH or SPDN for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SH or SPDN?
SH charges 0.88% a year and SPDN charges 0.48%, so SPDN is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, SH against SPDN, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/sh-vs-spdn

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.