SH vs SPXU: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SH finished 1.7 points over and SPXU 3.4 points over. ProShares Short S&P500 and ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500.

−1.1%
SH returned, 3 months
−5.4%
SPXU returned, 3 months
+1.5 pts
SH from its stated multiple
+2.1 pts
SPXU from its stated multiple
SH · 3 months to Sep 30, 20261.5 pts ahead of its stated multiple
1.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleSH returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%SPY +2.5% ×−1 implies−2.5%SH returned−1.1%1.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleSH returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%SPY +2.5% ×−1 implies−2.5%SH returned−1.1%

SH returned −1.1% while −1 times SPY's move would have been −2.5%

SPXU · 3 months to Sep 30, 20262.1 pts ahead of its stated multiple
2.1 pts ahead of its stated multipleSPXU returned −5.4% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%SPY +2.5% ×−3 implies−7.6%SPXU returned−5.4%2.1 pts ahead of its stated multipleSPXU returned −5.4% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%SPY +2.5% ×−3 implies−7.6%SPXU returned−5.4%

SPXU returned −5.4% while −3 times SPY's move would have been −7.6%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SPXU scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSHSPXUSHSPXUSHSPXU
1 month+0.8%+1.6%+0.3%+1.0%+0.4 pts+0.6 pts
3 months−1.1%−5.4%−2.5%−7.6%+1.5 pts+2.1 pts
6 months−12.3%−35.9%−17.0%−50.9%+4.7 pts+15.1 pts
1 year−9.1%−32.4%−15.7%−47.1%+6.7 pts+14.8 pts
3 years−35.5%−82.5%−85.0%−254.9%+49.5 pts+172.4 pts
Since launch
SH Jan 2010 · SPXU Jan 2010
−90.3%−100.0%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

SH and SPXU over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SH
ProShares Short S&P500 · Aims to return 1 times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
SPXU
ProShares UltraPro Short S&P500 · Aims to return three times the opposite of the daily move of the S&P 500
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return -1x -3x
Underlying asset SPY SPY
Segment us large cap us large cap
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −1.1% −5.4%
Underlying returned, over that window +2.5% +2.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −2.5% −7.6%
Difference from stated, over that window +1.5 pts +2.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −9.1% −32.4%
Difference from stated, over that window +6.7 pts +14.8 pts
Underlying volatility 11% 11%
Difference over the days both have traded +1.5 pts +2.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.88% 0.90%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $1.0bn $430m

SH and SPXU on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SH in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SH returned −1.1% where its own daily promise gave −2.8%, 1.7 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −1 times SPY's 2.5% implies −2.5%, which makes SH look 1.5 points over. 0.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −1 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SH aims to return -1 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -1 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPY moved at 11% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPXU in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPXU returned −5.4% where its own daily promise gave −8.9%, 3.4 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times SPY's 2.5% implies −7.6%, which makes SPXU look 2.1 points over. 1.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPXU aims to return -3 times SPY's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SH or SPXU?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SH finished 1.5 points from what its multiple implies and SPXU finished 2.1 points from its own, so SH came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SH and SPXU levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on the S&P 500, SH at -1 times and SPXU at -3 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SH or SPXU?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SH’s moved at 11% annualized and SPXU’s at 11%, so SH has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SH or SPXU for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SH or SPXU?
SH charges 0.88% a year and SPXU charges 0.90%, so SH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, SH against SPXU, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/sh-vs-spxu

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.