Which came closer to its stated multiple, LOFD or SPCF?

Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, LOFD finished 2.7 points from what its multiple implies and SPCF finished 14.1 points from its own, so LOFD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.

Are LOFD and SPCF levered on the same thing?

Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, LOFD at -2 times and SPCF at +2 times the daily move.

Which one decays faster, LOFD or SPCF?

Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LOFD’s moved at 44% annualized and SPCF’s at 70%, so SPCF has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.

Can I hold LOFD or SPCF for a year?

Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.

Which is cheaper, LOFD or SPCF?

LOFD charges 0.97% a year and SPCF charges 0.95%, so SPCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Share on X Download as PDF Open live

LOFD vs SPCF: which held to its multiple?

Over a month against its own daily promise, LOFD finished 1.0 points over and SPCF 1.4 points short. Direxion Daily SpaceX Bear 2X ETF and ProShares Ultra SpaceX.

−51.5%

LOFD returned, since launch

−22.6%

SPCF returned, 3 months

+11.0 pts

LOFD from its stated multiple

−14.1 pts

SPCF from its stated multiple

LOFD · 1 month to Sep 30, 20262.7 pts short of its stated multiple

LOFD returned −12.7% while −2 times SPCX's move would have been −10.0%

SPCF · 3 months to Sep 30, 202614.1 pts short of its stated multiple

SPCF returned −22.6% while 2 times SPCX's move would have been −8.5%

Performance, window by window

	Total return		Multiple would give		Difference
Window	LOFD	SPCF	LOFD	SPCF	LOFD	SPCF
1 month	−12.7%	+7.1%	−10.0%	+10.0%	−2.7 pts	−2.9 pts
3 months	not published	−22.6%	not published	−8.5%	not published	−14.1 pts
Since launch LOFD Aug 2026 · SPCF Jun 2026	−51.5%	−51.7%	−62.5%	−43.3%	+11.0 pts	−8.5 pts

LOFD and SPCF over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

LOFD

Direxion Daily SpaceX Bear 2X ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)

SPCF

ProShares Ultra SpaceX · Aims to return twice the daily move of Space Exploration Technologies (SPCX)

Issuer Direxion ProShares

Sets out to return -2x +2x

Underlying asset SPCX SPCX

Segment company company

Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −12.7% −22.6%

Underlying returned, over that window +5.0% −4.2%

What the stated multiple implies, over that window −10.0% −8.5%

Difference from stated, over that window −2.7 pts −14.1 pts

Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −51.5% −51.7%

Difference from stated, over that window +11.0 pts −8.5 pts

Underlying volatility 44% 70%

Difference over the days both have traded −2.7 pts −14.1 pts

Expense ratio 0.97% 0.95%

Launched Aug 6, 2026 Jun 15, 2026

Net assets $2m $94m

LOFD and SPCF on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

LOFD in plain words

One month to Sep 30, 2026: LOFD returned −12.7% where its own daily promise gave −13.6%, 1.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times SPCX's 5.0% implies −10.0%, which makes LOFD look 2.7 points short. 3.6 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. LOFD aims to return -2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 44% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SPCF in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SPCF returned −22.6% where its own daily promise gave −18.6%, 4.0 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times SPCX's −4.2% implies −8.5%, which makes SPCF look 14.1 points short. 10.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SPCF aims to return +2 times SPCX's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. SPCX moved at 70% annualized over that window.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, LOFD or SPCF?: Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, LOFD finished 2.7 points from what its multiple implies and SPCF finished 14.1 points from its own, so LOFD came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are LOFD and SPCF levered on the same thing?: Yes. Both are levered on Space Exploration Technologies, LOFD at -2 times and SPCF at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, LOFD or SPCF?: Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window LOFD’s moved at 44% annualized and SPCF’s at 70%, so SPCF has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold LOFD or SPCF for a year?: Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, LOFD or SPCF?: LOFD charges 0.97% a year and SPCF charges 0.95%, so SPCF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

LOFD vs SPAX LOFD vs SPCQ LOFD vs SPCU LOFD vs SSPC SPCF vs SPCG SPCF vs SPCH SPCF vs SPCM SPCF vs SPCQ

LOFD on its own →SPCF on its own →How every figure is computed →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

LOFD filings on SEC EDGAR ↗LOFD prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Direxion website ↗SPCF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗SPCF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗ProShares page for SPCF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, LOFD against SPCF, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/lofd-vs-spcf

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.