FAZ vs SKF: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, FAZ finished 4.0 points over and SKF 2.5 points over. Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X ETF and ProShares UltraShort Financials.
FAZ returned +8.1% while −3 times XLF's move would have been +6.5%
SKF returned +5.7% while −2 times XLF's move would have been +4.4%
A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | FAZ | SKF | FAZ | SKF | FAZ | SKF |
| 1 month | +25.2% | +16.2% | +21.4% | +14.3% | +3.8 pts | +1.9 pts |
| 3 months | +8.1% | +5.7% | +6.5% | +4.4% | +1.6 pts | +1.4 pts |
| 6 months | −20.8% | −13.7% | −26.3% | −17.5% | +5.5 pts | +3.9 pts |
| 1 year | +0.2% | +2.4% | −2.0% | −1.4% | +2.2 pts | +3.7 pts |
| 3 years | −77.8% | −60.2% | −205.8% | −137.2% | +128.0 pts | +77.0 pts |
| Since launch FAZ Jan 2010 · SKF Jan 2010 | −100.0% | −99.5% | not meaningful | not meaningful | not meaningful | not meaningful |
FAZ and SKF over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
FAZ and SKF on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FAZ in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: FAZ returned +8.1% where its own daily promise gave +4.2%, 4.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times XLF's −2.2% implies +6.5%, which makes FAZ look 1.6 points over. 2.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. FAZ aims to return -3 times XLF's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. XLF moved at 13% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
SKF in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SKF returned +5.7% where its own daily promise gave +3.2%, 2.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times XLF's −2.2% implies +4.4%, which makes SKF look 1.4 points over. 1.2 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SKF aims to return -2 times XLF's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, FAZ or SKF?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, FAZ finished 1.6 points from what its multiple implies and SKF finished 1.4 points from its own, so SKF came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are FAZ and SKF levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on financials, FAZ at -3 times and SKF at -2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, FAZ or SKF?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window FAZ’s moved at 13% annualized and SKF’s at 13%, so FAZ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold FAZ or SKF for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, FAZ against SKF, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/faz-vs-skf
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, FAZ against SKF, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/faz-vs-skf Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, FAZ against SKF, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/faz-vs-skf
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). FAZ against SKF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/faz-vs-skf
- Markdown
- [FAZ against SKF (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/faz-vs-skf)