EDZ vs EET: which held to its multiple?
Over three months against its own daily promise, EDZ finished 3.0 points over and EET 1.6 points short. Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bear 3X ETF and ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets.
EDZ returned −6.7% while −3 times EEM's move would have been −1.4%
EET returned −2.1% while 2 times EEM's move would have been +0.9%
EDZ among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months
EET among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months
A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. EET is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →
Performance, window by window
| Total return | Multiple would give | Difference | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Window | EDZ | EET | EDZ | EET | EDZ | EET |
| 1 month | −0.4% | −1.7% | +1.0% | −0.7% | −1.4 pts | −1.1 pts |
| 3 months | −6.7% | −2.1% | −1.4% | +0.9% | −5.3 pts | −3.0 pts |
| 6 months | −48.5% | +28.4% | −51.9% | +34.6% | +3.4 pts | −6.2 pts |
| 1 year | −62.3% | +43.3% | −82.5% | +55.0% | +20.3 pts | −11.7 pts |
| 3 years | −88.0% | +159.3% | −267.2% | +178.1% | +179.2 pts | −18.9 pts |
| Since launch EDZ Jan 2010 · EET Jan 2010 | −99.8% | +30.6% | not meaningful | not meaningful | not meaningful | not meaningful |
EDZ and EET over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →
On the same fields
EDZ and EET on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
EDZ in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EDZ returned −6.7% where its own daily promise gave −9.8%, 3.0 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −3 times EEM's 0.5% implies −1.4%, which makes EDZ look 5.3 points short. 8.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EDZ aims to return -3 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EEM moved at 24% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.
EET in plain words
Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EET returned −2.1% where its own daily promise gave −0.5%, 1.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times EEM's 0.5% implies +0.9%, which makes EET look 3.0 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EET aims to return +2 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.
Questions people ask
- Which came closer to its stated multiple, EDZ or EET?
- Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, EDZ finished 5.3 points from what its multiple implies and EET finished 3.0 points from its own, so EET came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
- Are EDZ and EET levered on the same thing?
- Yes. Both are levered on emerging markets, EDZ at -3 times and EET at +2 times the daily move.
- Which one decays faster, EDZ or EET?
- Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window EDZ’s moved at 24% annualized and EET’s at 24%, so EDZ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
- Can I hold EDZ or EET for a year?
- Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
ETFIQ, EDZ against EET, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/edz-vs-eet
Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, EDZ against EET, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/edz-vs-eet Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
Other forms
- Plain
- ETFIQ, EDZ against EET, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/edz-vs-eet
- APA
- ETFIQ. (Sep 30, 2026). EDZ against EET. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/edz-vs-eet
- Markdown
- [EDZ against EET (ETFIQ, Sep 30, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/edz-vs-eet)