EDC vs EET: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, EDC finished 2.8 points short and EET 1.6 points short. Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X ETF and ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets.

−5.8%
EDC returned, 3 months
−2.1%
EET returned, 3 months
−7.2 pts
EDC from its stated multiple
−3.0 pts
EET from its stated multiple
EDC · 3 months to Sep 30, 20267.2 pts short of its stated multiple
7.2 pts short of its stated multipleEDC returned −5.8% while 3 times EEM's move would have been +1.4%EEM +0.5% ×3 implies+1.4%EDC returned−5.8%7.2 pts short of its stated multipleEDC returned −5.8% while 3 times EEM's move would have been +1.4%EEM +0.5% ×3 implies+1.4%EDC returned−5.8%

EDC returned −5.8% while 3 times EEM's move would have been +1.4%

EET · 3 months to Sep 30, 20263 pts short of its stated multiple
3 pts short of its stated multipleEET returned −2.1% while 2 times EEM's move would have been +0.9%EEM +0.5% ×2 implies+0.9%EET returned−2.1%3 pts short of its stated multipleEET returned −2.1% while 2 times EEM's move would have been +0.9%EEM +0.5% ×2 implies+0.9%EET returned−2.1%

EET returned −2.1% while 2 times EEM's move would have been +0.9%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · EET scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowEDCEETEDCEETEDCEET
1 month−2.9%−1.7%−1.0%−0.7%−1.9 pts−1.1 pts
3 months−5.8%−2.1%+1.4%+0.9%−7.2 pts−3.0 pts
6 months+35.0%+28.4%+51.9%+34.6%−16.9 pts−6.2 pts
1 year+52.7%+43.3%+82.5%+55.0%−29.8 pts−11.7 pts
3 years+227.7%+159.3%+267.2%+178.1%−39.5 pts−18.9 pts
Since launch
EDC Jan 2010 · EET Jan 2010
−62.0%+30.6%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

EDC and EET over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

EDC
Direxion Daily MSCI Emerging Markets Bull 3X ETF · Aims to return three times the daily move of emerging markets (EEM)
EET
ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets · Aims to return twice the daily move of emerging markets (EEM)
Issuer Direxion ProShares
Sets out to return +3x +2x
Underlying asset EEM EEM
Segment country country
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −5.8% −2.1%
Underlying returned, over that window +0.5% +0.5%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +1.4% +0.9%
Difference from stated, over that window −7.2 pts −3.0 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +52.7% +43.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −29.8 pts −11.7 pts
Underlying volatility 24% 24%
Expense ratio 1.09% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $160m $42m

EDC and EET on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

EDC in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EDC returned −5.8% where its own daily promise gave −3.0%, 2.8 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 3 times EEM's 0.5% implies +1.4%, which makes EDC look 7.2 points short. 4.4 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EDC aims to return +3 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. EEM moved at 24% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

EET in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: EET returned −2.1% where its own daily promise gave −0.5%, 1.6 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times EEM's 0.5% implies +0.9%, which makes EET look 3.0 points short. 1.5 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. EET aims to return +2 times EEM's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, EDC or EET?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, EDC finished 7.2 points from what its multiple implies and EET finished 3.0 points from its own, so EET came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are EDC and EET levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on emerging markets, EDC at +3 times and EET at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, EDC or EET?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window EDC’s moved at 24% annualized and EET’s at 24%, so EDC has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold EDC or EET for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, EDC or EET?
EDC charges 1.09% a year and EET charges 0.95%, so EET is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, EDC against EET, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/edc-vs-eet

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.