DUSL vs UXI: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, DUSL finished 1.9 points short and UXI 0.9 points short. Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X ETF and ProShares Ultra Industrials.

−27.0%
DUSL returned, 3 months
−18.0%
UXI returned, 3 months
−0.9 pts
DUSL from its stated multiple
−0.6 pts
UXI from its stated multiple
DUSL · 3 months to Sep 30, 20260.9 pts short of its stated multiple
0.9 pts short of its stated multipleDUSL returned −27.0% while 3 times XLI's move would have been −26.1%XLI −8.7% ×3 implies−26.1%DUSL returned−27.0%0.9 pts short of its stated multipleDUSL returned −27.0% while 3 times XLI's move would have been −26.1%XLI −8.7% ×3 implies−26.1%DUSL returned−27.0%

DUSL returned −27.0% while 3 times XLI's move would have been −26.1%

UXI · 3 months to Sep 30, 20260.6 pts short of its stated multiple
0.6 pts short of its stated multipleUXI returned −18.0% while 2 times XLI's move would have been −17.4%XLI −8.7% ×2 implies−17.4%UXI returned−18.0%0.6 pts short of its stated multipleUXI returned −18.0% while 2 times XLI's move would have been −17.4%XLI −8.7% ×2 implies−17.4%UXI returned−18.0%

UXI returned −18.0% while 2 times XLI's move would have been −17.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · UXI scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowDUSLUXIDUSLUXIDUSLUXI
1 month−13.9%−9.1%−13.2%−8.8%−0.7 pts−0.3 pts
3 months−27.0%−18.0%−26.1%−17.4%−0.9 pts−0.6 pts
6 months−3.3%0.0%+6.2%+4.1%−9.5 pts−4.1 pts
1 year+8.7%+10.3%+28.5%+19.0%−19.8 pts−8.6 pts
3 years+181.0%+124.7%+215.1%+143.4%−34.1 pts−18.7 pts
Since launch
DUSL May 2017 · UXI Jan 2010
+274.6%+1919.9%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

DUSL and UXI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

DUSL
Direxion Daily Industrials Bull 3X ETF · Aims to return three times the daily move of State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI)
UXI
ProShares Ultra Industrials · Aims to return twice the daily move of State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI)
Issuer Direxion ProShares
Sets out to return +3x +2x
Underlying asset XLI XLI
Segment sector sector
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −27.0% −18.0%
Underlying returned, over that window −8.7% −8.7%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −26.1% −17.4%
Difference from stated, over that window −0.9 pts −0.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +8.7% +10.3%
Difference from stated, over that window −19.8 pts −8.6 pts
Underlying volatility 14% 14%
Difference over the days both have traded no shared window −0.6 pts
Expense ratio 0.97% 0.95%
Launched May 3, 2017 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $41m $25m

DUSL and UXI on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DUSL in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: DUSL returned −27.0% where its own daily promise gave −25.1%, 1.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 3 times XLI's −8.7% implies −26.1%, which makes DUSL look 0.9 points short. 1.0 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 3 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. DUSL aims to return +3 times XLI's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +3 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. XLI moved at 14% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UXI in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: UXI returned −18.0% where its own daily promise gave −17.1%, 0.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times XLI's −8.7% implies −17.4%, which makes UXI look 0.6 points short. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UXI aims to return +2 times XLI's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, DUSL or UXI?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, DUSL finished 0.9 points from what its multiple implies and UXI finished 0.6 points from its own, so UXI came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are DUSL and UXI levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF, DUSL at +3 times and UXI at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, DUSL or UXI?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window DUSL’s moved at 14% annualized and UXI’s at 14%, so DUSL has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold DUSL or UXI for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, DUSL or UXI?
DUSL charges 0.97% a year and UXI charges 0.95%, so UXI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, DUSL against UXI, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/dusl-vs-uxi

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.