SIJ vs UXI: which held to its multiple?

Over three months against its own daily promise, SIJ finished 2.8 points over and UXI 0.9 points short. ProShares UltraShort Industrials and ProShares Ultra Industrials.

+20.9%
SIJ returned, 3 months
−18.0%
UXI returned, 3 months
+3.5 pts
SIJ from its stated multiple
−0.6 pts
UXI from its stated multiple
SIJ · 3 months to Sep 30, 20263.5 pts ahead of its stated multiple
3.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleSIJ returned +20.9% while −2 times XLI's move would have been +17.4%XLI −8.7% ×−2 implies+17.4%SIJ returned+20.9%3.5 pts ahead of its stated multipleSIJ returned +20.9% while −2 times XLI's move would have been +17.4%XLI −8.7% ×−2 implies+17.4%SIJ returned+20.9%

SIJ returned +20.9% while −2 times XLI's move would have been +17.4%

UXI · 3 months to Sep 30, 20260.6 pts short of its stated multiple
0.6 pts short of its stated multipleUXI returned −18.0% while 2 times XLI's move would have been −17.4%XLI −8.7% ×2 implies−17.4%UXI returned−18.0%0.6 pts short of its stated multipleUXI returned −18.0% while 2 times XLI's move would have been −17.4%XLI −8.7% ×2 implies−17.4%UXI returned−18.0%

UXI returned −18.0% while 2 times XLI's move would have been −17.4%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · UXI scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?

SIJ among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months

SIJ 80.4
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

UXI among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months

UXI 95.6
0.1, the lowest in this set99.9, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. UXI is a percentile among the 470 leveraged ETFs, long, over three months, a different set, so the two marks are not on one scale. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowSIJUXISIJUXISIJUXI
1 month+9.7%−9.1%+8.8%−8.8%+0.9 pts−0.3 pts
3 months+20.9%−18.0%+17.4%−17.4%+3.5 pts−0.6 pts
6 months−3.8%0.0%−4.1%+4.1%+0.3 pts−4.1 pts
1 year−15.5%+10.3%−19.0%+19.0%+3.5 pts−8.6 pts
3 years−62.5%+124.7%−143.4%+143.4%+80.8 pts−18.7 pts
Since launch
SIJ Jan 2010 · UXI Jan 2010
−99.6%+1919.9%not meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningfulnot meaningful

SIJ and UXI over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

SIJ
ProShares UltraShort Industrials · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI)
UXI
ProShares Ultra Industrials · Aims to return twice the daily move of State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLI)
Issuer ProShares ProShares
Sets out to return -2x +2x
Underlying asset XLI XLI
Segment sector sector
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch +20.9% −18.0%
Underlying returned, over that window −8.7% −8.7%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window +17.4% −17.4%
Difference from stated, over that window +3.5 pts −0.6 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch −15.5% +10.3%
Difference from stated, over that window +3.5 pts −8.6 pts
Underlying volatility 14% 14%
Difference over the days both have traded no shared window −0.6 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
Launched Jan 4, 2010 Jan 4, 2010
Net assets $7m $25m

SIJ and UXI on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

SIJ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SIJ returned +20.9% where its own daily promise gave +18.0%, 2.8 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times XLI's −8.7% implies +17.4%, which makes SIJ look 3.5 points over. 0.7 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. SIJ aims to return -2 times XLI's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. XLI moved at 14% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

UXI in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: UXI returned −18.0% where its own daily promise gave −17.1%, 0.9 points short. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and 2 times XLI's −8.7% implies −17.4%, which makes UXI look 0.6 points short. 0.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any 2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. UXI aims to return +2 times XLI's move each day, then resets. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not +2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, SIJ or UXI?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, SIJ finished 3.5 points from what its multiple implies and UXI finished 0.6 points from its own, so UXI came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are SIJ and UXI levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR ETF, SIJ at -2 times and UXI at +2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, SIJ or UXI?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window SIJ’s moved at 14% annualized and UXI’s at 14%, so SIJ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold SIJ or UXI for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, SIJ or UXI?
SIJ charges 0.95% a year and UXI charges 0.95%, so SIJ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page

ETFIQ, SIJ against UXI, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/sij-vs-uxi

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.