BTCZ vs SBIT: which held to its multiple?

Over the days both have traded, BTCZ finished 24.8 points from its stated multiple and SBIT 25.1. T-REX 2X INVERSE BITCOIN DAILY TARGET ETF and ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF.

−53.7%
BTCZ returned, 3 months
−53.4%
SBIT returned, 3 months
+24.8 pts
BTCZ from its stated multiple
+25.1 pts
SBIT from its stated multiple
BTCZ · 3 months to Sep 30, 202624.8 pts ahead of its stated multiple
24.8 pts ahead of its stated multipleBTCZ returned −53.7% while −2 times IBIT's move would have been −78.5%IBIT +39.2% ×−2 implies−78.5%BTCZ returned−53.7%24.8 pts ahead of its stated multipleBTCZ returned −53.7% while −2 times IBIT's move would have been −78.5%IBIT +39.2% ×−2 implies−78.5%BTCZ returned−53.7%

BTCZ returned −53.7% while −2 times IBIT's move would have been −78.5%

SBIT · 3 months to Sep 30, 202625.1 pts ahead of its stated multiple
25.1 pts ahead of its stated multipleSBIT returned −53.4% while −2 times IBIT's move would have been −78.5%IBIT +39.2% ×−2 implies−78.5%SBIT returned−53.4%25.1 pts ahead of its stated multipleSBIT returned −53.4% while −2 times IBIT's move would have been −78.5%IBIT +39.2% ×−2 implies−78.5%SBIT returned−53.4%

SBIT returned −53.4% while −2 times IBIT's move would have been −78.5%

ETFIQ Decay Resistance Score · SBIT scores higherDid it keep up with its own daily multiple, compounded day by day?
0.4, the lowest in this set99.6, the highest

A percentile among the 125 inverse ETFs over three months. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All leveraged ETFs ranked by it → How it is computed →

Performance, window by window

Total returnMultiple would giveDifference
WindowBTCZSBITBTCZSBITBTCZSBIT
1 month−14.5%−14.6%−12.0%−12.0%−2.6 pts−2.7 pts
3 months−53.7%−53.4%−78.5%−78.5%+24.8 pts+25.1 pts
6 months−45.8%−44.6%−45.0%−45.0%−0.7 pts+0.4 pts
1 year+4.1%+10.6%+54.3%+54.3%−50.3 pts−43.7 pts
Since launch
BTCZ Jul 2024 · SBIT Apr 2024
−88.4%−85.3%−89.8%−51.8%+1.4 pts−33.5 pts

BTCZ and SBIT over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ. Open the live comparison on ETFIQ →

On the same fields

BTCZ
T-REX 2X INVERSE BITCOIN DAILY TARGET ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of bitcoin (IBIT)
SBIT
ProShares UltraShort Bitcoin ETF · Aims to return twice the opposite of the daily move of bitcoin (IBIT)
Issuer T-REX ProShares
Sets out to return -2x -2x
Underlying asset IBIT IBIT
Segment crypto crypto
Fund returned, 3 months or since launch −53.7% −53.4%
Underlying returned, over that window +39.2% +39.2%
What the stated multiple implies, over that window −78.5% −78.5%
Difference from stated, over that window +24.8 pts +25.1 pts
Fund returned, 1 year or since launch +4.1% +10.6%
Difference from stated, over that window −50.3 pts −43.7 pts
Underlying volatility 38% 38%
Difference over the days both have traded +24.8 pts +25.1 pts
Expense ratio 0.95% 0.95%
Launched Jul 10, 2024 Apr 2, 2024
Net assets $16m $128m

BTCZ and SBIT on the same fields, as of Sep 30, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

BTCZ in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: BTCZ returned −53.7% where its own daily promise gave −54.2%, 0.5 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times IBIT's 39.2% implies −78.5%, which makes BTCZ look 24.8 points over. 24.3 of that is daily compounding, which happens to any −2 times fund over the same path, and the rest is the fund. BTCZ aims to return -2 times IBIT's move each day, then resets. Over one day it does that. Over longer, the daily results compound, so the total is not -2 times the period's move: in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less, and in a steady run it can be more. IBIT moved at 38% annualized over that window. That is what decides how far the two figures separate: the same fund on a calm underlying and a violent one is a different product.

SBIT in plain words

Three months to Sep 30, 2026: SBIT returned −53.4% where its own daily promise gave −54.2%, 0.8 points over. Read the multiple against the whole window instead and −2 times IBIT's 39.2% implies −78.5%, which makes SBIT look 25.1 points over. SBIT aims to return -2 times IBIT's move each day, then resets.

Questions people ask

Which came closer to its stated multiple, BTCZ or SBIT?
Over the window to Sep 30, 2026, BTCZ finished 24.8 points from what its multiple implies and SBIT finished 25.1 points from its own, so BTCZ came closer. Neither figure predicts the next window: it depends on how much the underlying moves about.
Are BTCZ and SBIT levered on the same thing?
Yes. Both are levered on bitcoin, BTCZ at -2 times and SBIT at -2 times the daily move.
Which one decays faster, BTCZ or SBIT?
Decay follows how much the underlying moves about. Over this window BTCZ’s moved at 38% annualized and SBIT’s at 38%, so BTCZ has the rougher ride and, at the same multiple, loses more to compounding.
Can I hold BTCZ or SBIT for a year?
Both reset every day, so the multiple in the name applies to a single day and the daily results compound. Over a year the total is not the multiple times the year’s move, and in a market that falls and comes back it is reliably less. ETFIQ makes no recommendation either way.
Which is cheaper, BTCZ or SBIT?
BTCZ charges 0.95% a year and SBIT charges 0.95%, so BTCZ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Cite this page

ETFIQ, BTCZ against SBIT, data as of Sep 30, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/leverage/btcz-vs-sbit

Open data

Free to use with attribution. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology.