Get the weekly note
ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

Data as of .

YMAG vs YQQQ: which paid, and which earned it?

Over the year YMAG paid 35.5% of its price in cash against YQQQ’s 23.1%, and returned more with it reinvested.

YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs and YieldMax(R) Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF.

35.5%YMAG cash paid, 1 year
23.1%YQQQ cash paid, 1 year
+9.7%YMAG total return, 1 year
−3.5%YQQQ total return, 1 year

ETFIQ Return Stability Score: YMAG scores higher

Was the payout funded by returns, or by your own capital?

YMAG 33.8YQQQ 7.53.8, the lowest in this set96.8, the highest

A percentile among the 173 income ETFs writing on an index or proxy. It is a position in a set, not a rating, and neither end of it is a recommendation. All income ETFs ranked by it · How it is computed

YMAG1.5 pts behind MAGS · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
MAGS+11.2%YMAG+9.7%35.5% of it arrived as cash1.5 pts behind MAGSTotal return, distributions reinvestedMAGS+11.2%YMAG+9.7%1.5 pts behind MAGS
YQQQ25.3 pts behind QQQ · 1 year to Sep 18, 2026
QQQ+21.8%YQQQ−3.5%25.3 pts behind QQQTotal return, distributions reinvestedQQQ+21.8%YQQQ−3.5%25.3 pts behind QQQ

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, YMAG and YQQQ hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions YMAG and YQQQ both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingYMAGYQQQ
First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.87%5.94%
Only in each
Only in YMAGOnly in YQQQ
YieldMax NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF 14.58%United States Treasury Note/Bond 2.375% 05/15/2027 28.76%
YieldMax AAPL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.24%United States Treasury Bill 07/08/2027 28.59%
YieldMax Tsla Option Income ETF 14.21%United States Treasury Bill 02/18/2027 17.25%
YieldMax Amzn Option Income ETF 14.11%United States Treasury Bill 12/10/2026 13.01%
YieldMax GOOGL Option Income Strategy ETF 14.11%United States Treasury Bill 10/15/2026 7.09%
YieldMax Meta Option Income Strategy ETF 13.99%QQQ 10/16/2026 720.02 P 1.66%
YieldMax MSFT Option Income Strategy ETF 13.90%QQQ US 09/25/26 P690 0.06%
QQQ US 09/18/26 P685 0.00%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Sep 21, 2026.

Performance, window by window

YMAG and YQQQ over each window. Every figure is an ETFIQ calculation with distributions reinvested. Source: ETFIQ.
WindowTotal returnCash paidAgainst the benchmark
YMAGYQQQYMAGYQQQYMAGYQQQ
3 months+6.1%+5.8%9.4%6.5%−1.6 pts+8.3 pts
6 months+15.4%−13.9%21.1%10.8%−5.3 pts−38.2 pts
1 year+9.7%−3.5%35.5%23.1%−1.5 pts−25.3 pts
Since launch+70.7%−17.6%89.1%37.0%−34.1 pts−71.2 pts
Open the live comparison on ETFIQ
YMAG and YQQQ on the same fields, as of Sep 18, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
YMAG
YieldMax(R) Magnificent 7 Fund of Option Income ETFs
Synthetic covered call on MAGS, paying weekly
YQQQ
YieldMax(R) Short N100 Option Income Strategy ETF
Synthetic covered call on QQQ, paying weekly
IssuerYieldMaxYieldMax
Strategysynthetic covered callsynthetic covered call
BenchmarkMagnificent Seven (MAGS)Nasdaq-100 (QQQ)
Paysweeklyweekly
Payout rate, annualized30.9%21.3%
Expense ratio1.34%1.11%
Cash paid, 1 year35.5%23.1%
Price change, 1 year−28.1%−25.7%
Total return, 1 year+9.7%−3.5%
Benchmark return, 1 year+11.2%+21.8%
Ahead or behind−1.5 pts−25.3 pts
Return of capital, latest estimate80%0%
Age962 days764 days
Net assets$297m$27m

YMAG in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 28.1%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned +9.7%. Magnificent Seven (MAGS) returned +11.2% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 1.5 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 30.9%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 80% of the distribution paid Sep 17, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

YQQQ in plain words

Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YQQQ paid 23.1% of its starting value in cash distributions while its price fell 25.7%. With every distribution reinvested, the fund returned −3.5%. Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) returned +21.8% over the same days, so a holder was behind by 25.3 pts. At its price on Sep 18, 2026 the latest distribution annualizes to 21.3%, paid weekly. YieldMax estimates that 0% of the distribution paid Sep 18, 2026 was a return of capital (19a-1 notice, estimated, a tax characterization rather than a measure of erosion).

Questions people ask

Which paid more, YMAG or YQQQ?
Over the year to Sep 18, 2026, YMAG paid 35.5% of its starting price in cash and YQQQ paid 23.1%, so YMAG paid more. Cash paid is not the same as money made: the price change matters too.
Which returned more once distributions are counted, YMAG or YQQQ?
With every distribution reinvested, YMAG returned +9.7% and YQQQ returned −3.5% over the year to Sep 18, 2026, so YMAG returned more.
Which is cheaper, YMAG or YQQQ?
YMAG charges 1.34% a year and YQQQ charges 1.11%, so YQQQ is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

YMAG against YQQQ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. Every figure is calculated from a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, YMAG against YQQQ, data as of Sep 18, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/income/ymag-vs-yqqq Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

How every figure is computed · Standards and sources